Water fight | Arkansas Blog

Friday, October 10, 2008

Water fight

Posted By on Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:34 PM

I doubt this is reaching many average voters, but I still think it's great that the county judge's race has featured fierce discussions about protecting the Lake Maumelle watershed. Wonkery gone wild. That's good.

On the jump: Buddy Villines says activists have misinterpreted his position on land use issues.

Pulaski County


To: People interested in protecting the Watershed

From: F.G. “Buddy” Villines
County Judge/Chief Executive Officer

Date: October 9, 2008

Re: Position on the Watershed

Again, this time in the person of Ms. Kathy Wells, my position on the
Watershed has been grossly misrepresented. In this case she said I had
changed my position. Wrong. My position has been consistent. At the first
public hearing on the proposed subdivision ordinance, I said that if I had
my “druthers,” nothing would be developed in the Watershed. That not being
possible, and because the county did not have a zoning ordinance, nor the
capability or capacity to enact one now, we should enact the subdivision
ordinance, incorporating the science of the plan, to insure nothing is built
that will harm the Watershed.

On July 29, 2008, Ms. Karla Burnett presented the subdivision ordinance to
the Little Rock Board of Directors. She clearly stated that the County’s
position was that the subdivision ordinance was the first in “…an ongoing
evolving process….” (from the Watershed Management Plan).

On August 26, 2008, I wrote a letter to Ms. Annie Abrams, President of the
Coalition of Little Rock Neighborhoods. The pertinent paragraph follows:

“Perhaps the Plan itself said it best. “CAW, ratepayers, and other
stakeholders should expect that implementation of the Watershed Management
Plan will be an ongoing, evolving process for many years to come. The Plan
provides recommendations for how CAW, local governments, resource agencies,
non-governmental organizations, and other interested parties can work
together to coordinate plan implementation and ongoing adaptive management.
Such an adaptive approach will provide for long-term protection for Lake
Maumelle, allowing for management to be responsive to the dynamics of the
watershed.” The Plan itself recognizes that it will take years to implement
in its entirety-and, because the plan is based on a build out in the
Watershed that is expected to take place over many, many years-we have time
to work toward full implementation. The proposed Subdivision Rules and
Regulations are intended to be the County’s first step in this “ongoing,
evolving process.”

In conclusion, if you want to know my position, call me. The information
you are receiving is obviously unreliable.



Nowhere in any previous statement - quoted here or elsewhere - does the
county judge say he will zone land in watershed, and will zone large lots, 5
to 10 acres, as the Watershed Management Plan calls for officials to do.

Many have urged the county judge to accept this Plan recommendation, and he
has refused. In fact, last week, there were three occasions that marked
continued unwillingness to support large lots and the zoning required to
bring about large lots in development around Lake Maumelle.

At a Candidate Forum hosted by the Coalition of Greater LR Neighborhoods, on
Fri. Oct. 3, neither I, nor my colleague, Pres. Annie Abrams of the
Coalition, heard the county judge support large lots or zoning. he said a
land-use plan would be required first, and that would take a year, and he
offered subdivisions rules to protect the drinking water now. he did not say
he would seek to establish zoning. TetraTech, water utility consultants, has
debunked that subdivision proposal, as having invalid science, in the April
2 memo discussed previously.

In company with other advocates for our drinking water, I met with Chairman
Eddie Powell of the Central Arkansas Water Commission, on Tues. Sep. 30,
and with Commissioner Roby Robertson, on Thu. Oct. 2. Both told us they had
failed in repeated attempts to persuade Villines to change his position, and
to support large lots, and the zoning that would be required. We met to
consider how we might, together, find support to implement the Management
Plan. We were mutually stymied when we parted company, finding no approach
to make to the county judge, whose position had not altered over months of
encounters, as we saw it.

Something changed between Oct. 3 and Oct. 7, when Villines told those at
another Candidate Forum he would support subdivision rules immediately, and
that zoning would come later.

Best wishes,
Kathy Wells

From the ArkTimes store



Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Monday's open line

    Here's the Monday open line and today's news roundup
    • Nov 20, 2017
  • Protest set on tax legislation

    A coalition of groups will demonstrate at 12:15 p.m. Tuesday in front of the state Human Services headquarters at Seventh and Main to show displeasure with the Senate tax legislation.
    • Nov 20, 2017
  • Fayetteville has a City Council opening thanks to Alan Long's resignation

    Alan Long has resigned from the Fayetteville City Council with more than three years remaining on his term and the Council itself must decide at its meeting Tuesday whether to fill the seat itself or call a special election.
    • Nov 20, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Judge anticipates punishment of lawyers in Fort Smith class action case

    Federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith issued a 32-page ruling yesterday indicating he contemplates punishment of 16 lawyers who moved a class action lawsuit against an insurance company out of his court to a state court in Polk County after a settlement had been worked out.
    • Apr 15, 2016
  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016
  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Protest set on tax legislation

    • Stu/DullRazor, what about all those millionaires and billionaires getting much more something for nothing? The…

    • on November 20, 2017
  • Re: Protest set on tax legislation

    • Razor I must commend you for breaking the record in one post for multiple assumptions…

    • on November 20, 2017
  • Re: Protest set on tax legislation

    • Too bad they didnt show up when Asa was working to raise taxes.

    • on November 20, 2017



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation