Interesting question | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Interesting question

Posted By on Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:06 AM

A prosecutor in another jurisdiction asks for an attorney general's opinion on a matter of high interest in Pulaski County. It concerns the legality of judges imposing fees not authorized by statute payable to outside funds and agencies. That, of course, is what Judge Willard Proctor continues to do with the Cycle Breakers probation program he started and which has been focus of a critical state audit, a federal probe and an investigation by the state Judicial Discipline and Disabilty Commission. Because of the last investigation, the a.g. declined to issue an opinion.

SUMMARY OF A.G. OPINION:

Boyce, Henry H

Pros Att'y, 3rd Judicial District

Opinion:  In a criminal case, must a circuit judge, or any other judge, have state statutory authority to  impose fines, costs, sentences, fees, restitution, contributions, or any other penalties?  Q2) In a criminal case, is a circuit judge, or other judge, limited to the amounts of fines, costs, sentences, fees, restitution, contributions, or any other penalties provided by law?  Q3) In a criminal case, may a circuit judge order moneys to be paid in lieu of fines, costs, sentences, fees, restitution, contributions, or any other penalties or assessments to be paid into a separate bank account maintained by the circuit judge, prosecuting attorney, sheriff, or other official?  Q4) Does a circuit judge have the authority to approve a plea bargain arrangement where, as a condition of probation or a reduced sentence, the defendant must make a  "contribution" to a drug control fund or other cash fund?  Q5) In a criminal case, is there any authority for a judge to require the payment of a "contribution?" 

RESPONSE: I must  respectfully decline to address your questions because of this office's long-standing policy  against issuing opinions on matters that are the subject of pending or impending litigation or  an ongoing administrative proceeding. This policy has consistently been applied to matters pending before both administrative agencies and the courts. E.g., Ops. Att'y Gen. 2008-081, 99-139, 96-137, 90-114. Your questions are implicated in the ongoing proceedings of the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission against Circuit Judge Willard Proctor. Therefore, I am unable to answer your questions.

 


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Hucakbee interviews Trump

    • Reporting by our free press is "treason", now due process is out the window. It…

    • on June 24, 2018
  • Re: Hucakbee interviews Trump

    • I will not waste my time by watching that interview! No thanks!

    • on June 24, 2018
  • Re: Hucakbee interviews Trump

    • The USA just quit the human rights council at the U.N. The human rights councilFrom…

    • on June 24, 2018

Slideshows

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation