School choice | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

School choice

Posted By on Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:20 AM

You've perhaps read about the families in Malvern that don't think the schools are white enough and have dodged state law to enroll their children in neighboring school districts. Under Arkansas law, school choice is not allowed to promote segregation. The parents have sued since Malvern has tried to begin pulling its legal students back. A federal judge yesterday said the parents' lawsuit stood little chance of success.

In a related development, the attorney general's office today released an opinon that said, because of the ongoing legal action, it couldn't offer an opinion on the constitutionality of the Arkansas school choice law in light of a federal court precedent that says race alone may not be a determinant for student assignment.

It may be just me. But I don't think the Arkansas law makes race the only determinant on school admission. The law also considers residency and other factors for those seeking transfers, including sufficiency of a home school district. Until now, the parents fleeing Malvern haven't made much of a case that their moves have been related to any objective factor other than race. It may be their sole determinant, but not the state's.


QUESTION (from state Rep. Johnny Hoyt): In light of the Supreme Court decision (Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, et al.) that it is unconstitutional to base admission to schools solely on race, is the current School Choice law in Arkansas constitutional? 

RESPONSE:  I regret to say that I must respectfully decline to offer an opinion on your question at this time.  The constitutionality of the Arkansas Public School Choice Act of 1989 is the subject of pending  litigation in a lawsuit captioned Darrin Hardy et al. v. Malvern School District, Case No. 08-6094, United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas (Hot Springs Division).  My office has a longstanding policy of declining to render advisory opinions on matters pending before the courts.

 

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Judge anticipates punishment of lawyers in Fort Smith class action case

    Federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith issued a 32-page ruling yesterday indicating he contemplates punishment of 16 lawyers who moved a class action lawsuit against an insurance company out of his court to a state court in Polk County after a settlement had been worked out.
    • Apr 15, 2016
  • Payday lenders on the march at legislature

    Payday lenders are working hard to get legislative cover for the reintroduction of their usurious loan business to Arkansas. Some are fighting back.
    • Mar 10, 2017
  • LR speakers blast state board for double standard

    A series of speakers, beginning with Sen. Joyce Elliott, denounced what they saw as a hidden agenda favoring charter schools at the state Department of Education and asked the state Board of Education for return of local control.
    • May 12, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation