The subject is dope | Arkansas Blog

Friday, January 30, 2009

The subject is dope

Posted By on Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:06 PM

click to enlarge unknown.jpg

Meet Davy Carter. Freshman legislator from Cabot. Thanks to a reader, I'm notified of Rep. Carter's maiden bill filing.

It would require random testing for the presence of "illegal" drugs of ALL who receive services from the Department of Human Services. This presumably means foster children, the elderly, the infirm and mentally disabled, the whole sorry lot of them. If you want succor from the state of Arkansas, you must pee in a jar. If you can pee in a jar. If not, presumably samples would be drawn from catheter bags.

What happens when an "illegal" drug turns up? Young Mr. Carter doesn't say. Nor does he provide for the Rush Limbaughs of the world. Such as they can get high on legal drugs, albeit illegally obtained.

Worst Person in Arkansas -- Wanker of the Day -- STFU Award with Gold Cluster: Davy Carter. (Of course he voted against congratulating Barack Obama.)

Suggestion: IQ testing for all legislators. Minimum score of 60 required for service.

UPDATE: Rep. Carter gave me a call and tried to explain. On the jump.

UPDATE II: Thanks to a reader for informing me that Rep. Carter has a colleague wanker in the Senate, Denny Altes, who has filed a fleshier version of this idea. (And if Carter had good sense, he'd have referenced some of its provisions if he knew about them.) It's still mean stuff. People would be required to disclose their and their families' criminal records so that drug offenders could be barred from a wide range of government programs. A positive drug test would trigger mandatory treatment and failure to stay clean would earn you the boot. Lots of new government here. Lots of families harmed. Lots of past sins unforgiven. Compassionate Christian conservatism, not exactly.

I knew Carter's was a shell bill. And I'm still not clear exactly where he's heading, though I get Altes. He says it's a way to get the attention of DHS for further discussions on accountability for the billions the agency spends. He thinks, too, without being specific, that undeserving drug users are responsible for some of the costs, unfair in a time when money is needed for so many other things.

I don't like drug testing. There are no cash payments going to meth heads, I"m reasonably sure, and most aid programs support families not just the people with drug problems. Take benefits out and you harm them all. Carter insists he has no intention of depriving "deserving" children and families of benefits. I think it's unavoidable if you start throwing people off aid programs when drugs are detected, not to mention that drug users are clearly people in need of help. Altes would give them help, but a one-strike-you're-out type for a pathology notorious for slipups. Interesting that alcoholism isn't on his radar.

Carter sounds very earnest. I still think it's a dumb idea. You can have accountability discussions about DHS without scattershooting invasive legislation that targets the least among us. By all mean try to treat drug abuse. But make it a carrot, not a bludgeon.

I thought I'd catch him by saying, "What about drug testing legislators."

"Fine with me," he responded.


Comments (37)

Showing 1-37 of 37

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-37 of 37

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • DHS confirms it's withholding personnel records on Leslie Rutledge

    Chris Burks, the lawyer in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking personnel records of Attorney General Leslie Rutledge when she was a staff lawyer at the Department of Human Services, says DHS confirms the existence of records that have not been released in previous examinations of her record there.
    • Aug 18, 2018
  • Death reported in Malvern prison

    The Correction Department is reporting what it calls an apparent suicide Thursday evening in the Ouachita River Correction unit in Malvern.
    • Aug 18, 2018
  • Judge Griffen argues for dismissal of ethics case

    Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen made his argument today before the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission that ethics charges against him related to a death penalty protest should be dismissed on 1st Amendment grounds. He said it was a case "about optics, not ethics."
    • Aug 17, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017
  • Tom Cotton's influence on Trump's new security chief

    U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton is getting credit for pushing President Donald Trump to select Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster as his national security adviser, Politico reports.
    • Feb 21, 2017
  • Campus gun bill clears committee

    The so-called compromise amendment that will allow anyone 25 or older with a training certificate carry a concealed weapon on public college campuses was approved in a Senate committee this afternoon.
    • Feb 21, 2017

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation