Cosmetology protection act | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Cosmetology protection act

Posted By on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM

That Rep. Steve Faris is one cagey operator. Check out his bill to prohibit public schools from setting up cosmetology programs in competition with for-profit cosmetology schools.

I'll let the Arkansas School Boards Association explain what's wrong with this little bit of protectionism.


By: Senator Faris
By: Representative Dunn
ASBA is opposed to SB 107 which is an act to prohibit approval of certain cosmetological schools in public educational institutions; and for other purposes.
Currently, public school cosmetology programs are saving students and families an estimated $3 million a year in tuition alone.

SB 107 would create “do not approve” zones and prevent establishment of new cosmetology training programs in any public educational institution.

Article 14, Section 1 of Arkansas Constitution mandates, “…the State shall ever maintain a general, suitable and efficient system of free public schools and shall adopt all suitable means to secure to the people the advantages and opportunities of education.”

Any public K-12 school, public career and technical school, two-year college or four-year college seeking to establish an independent vocational cosmetology program would be denied program approval if the program site would be within 50 miles of any existing private school of cosmetology.

Any public cosmetology program within the “do not approve zone” would be forced to contract with an existing private school of cosmetology in order to provide a program to students.

To be licensed as a cosmetologist, 1500 hours of instruction are required, and a rigorous exam must be passed.  A high school student can complete between 500 and 750 hours of documented instruction in a high school program.

Arkansas public school districts and public-supported two-year schools offer a variety of technical programs besides cosmetology, including nursing and health-related occupations, culinary school, welding and information technology, which have direct competition from for-profit, private career and technical schools.

The developmental and instructional needs of 16-, 17- and 18-year-old students are different from those of older, private cosmetology school students. The students who are being served in the 15 existing programs as part of a high school program would not be enrolled in a private cosmetology school if the free, public school program were not available.

This bill presents a very slippery slope. Cosmetology is no different from any other career/technical program (such as auto body, welding, information technology, etc.) If this bill becomes law, other for-profit, private career and technical schools could seek similar protection, limiting competition and suppressing education opportunities for Arkansans.

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Jason Rapert vs. Wikipedia

    Sen. Jason Rapert against the world: Wikipedia edition.
    • Jan 23, 2016
  • Donald Trump declares war on Hillary Clinton's marriage

    Donald Trump gave a remarkable interview to the New York Times yesterday in which he declared open season on the marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton's past infidelity. Seems like a loser, but I've been wrong before.
    • Oct 1, 2016
  • Charter school accountability: Non-existent in Arkansas

    A state audit finds charter school spending violated state law, but the state Education Department says it has no responsibility for ensuring proper management of charter schools. Say what?
    • Mar 5, 2016

Most Shared

  • City ethics update; campaign limit was supposed to help the little guy

    Some more history on the Little Rock city ordinance that limits candidates for mayor and City Board to raising campaign funds to five months before the November 2018 election. It raises questions not only about Warwick Sabin's fund-raising tactics, but also Mayor Mark Stodola's carryover money.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation