Why 56 cents? | Arkansas Blog

Friday, February 13, 2009

Why 56 cents?

Posted By on Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:57 AM

I probably missed this elsewhere, but I got to thinking after passage of the tobacco tax yesterday about why 56 cents was chosen as the increase on the existing 59-cent-a-pack cigarette tax -- not 57, not 55. So I put the question to Matt DeCample, spokesman for Gov. Mike Beebe.

His response is on the jump. One brief comment from me first: It seems risible on its face to say the new money (which is going to general revenues, not specific earmarks) represents precisely the amount needed by each agency and no more This suggests an absolute precision and lack of elasticity in every single budget. Call me skeptical. Soon, we hope to provide reporting, just by way of example, of extraordinary waste in just one of the small agencies set to receive benefits.

I'm for the tax, the increase in general revenue and the leveraging of federal dollars for a triple benefit. But I'm also for straight talk.

On to the response ...

From Matt DeCample:

When we started looking at a comprehensive health-care package, we sat down and listed the programs we wanted to include.  They were prioritized by price and impact to get the biggest bang for the taxpayer dollar.  We figured out a precise cost based on DF&A projections so we could present that number as the proposed tax, and not a penny more.  That’s how we landed on 56 cents.  We also wanted to avoid the Christmas-tree approach of adding programs onto a bill throughout the process and inflating the cost leading up to the votes. 
 
Governor Beebe wanted a package that could directly and effectively benefit the most people throughout Arkansas without simply proposing a larger, more punitive increase in the tobacco tax, an idea that others advocated.  He recognized the impact on addicted smokers and the potential (now real) increase in the federal tax as well.  
 
Yes, this money will go into general revenue, as does nearly all tax money generated by the State.  Governor Beebe and legislative leaders are dedicated to ensuring that this new money is distributed to fund and support the specific programs laid out in our proposal.  This revenue will serve Arkansans who need it for better health care, often the poorest and most underserved of our citizens.  And everybody, regardless of income, will benefit from the statewide trauma system.

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (7)

Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • The assault weapon open line

    The open line. And report of the arrest of a man with an AR-15 who threatened to shoot people at a Springdale business.
    • Feb 17, 2018
  • A primary challenger for Rep. Laurie Rushing

    Blue Hog Report has some news on a Republican primary challenge of an incumbent legislator, Rep. Laurie Rushing, by Ernie Hinz of Hot Springs.
    • Feb 17, 2018
  • A common-sense gun measure draws no sponsors from Arkansas

    Republicans, including at least one from Arkansas, are talking about repealing the Dickey Amendment which prohibits gun research from a public health perspective. But none of them are yet willing to DO anything about it.
    • Feb 17, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • A mayor stands up against freeway widening. No. Not in Little Rock.

    Another booming city, Indianapolis, fights ever wider urban freeways. Meanwhile, back in Little Rock .....
  • In the margins

    A rediscovered violin concerto brings an oft-forgotten composer into the limelight.
  • Donald Trump is historically unpopular — and not necessarily where you think

    My colleagues John Ray and Jesse Bacon and I estimate, in the first analysis of its kind for the 2018 election season, that the president's waning popularity isn't limited to coastal cities and states. The erosion of his electoral coalition has spread to The Natural State, extending far beyond the college towns and urban centers that voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. From El Dorado to Sherwood, Fayetteville to Hot Springs, the president's approval rating is waning.
  • Arkansans join House vote to gut Americans with Disabilities Act

    Despite fierce protests from disabled people, the U.S. House voted today, mostly on party lines, to make it harder to sue businesses for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. Of course Arkansas congressmen were on the wrong side.

Most Viewed

  • The assault weapon open line

    The open line. And report of the arrest of a man with an AR-15 who threatened to shoot people at a Springdale business.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The assault weapon open line

    • Sorry, please ignore my post above, I had the wrong page in the "paste" position…

    • on February 17, 2018
  • Re: The assault weapon open line

    • Those kids give me hope to keep fighting the idiotic laws passed by the NRA…

    • on February 17, 2018
  • Re: The assault weapon open line

    • The level of "proud to be ignorant" folks seems to increase everyday critical thought, reason,…

    • on February 17, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation