Rep. Steve Harrelson previews the review of proposed constitutional amendments. As I mentioned earlier, proposals to allow the state to become an investor in private businesses and to loosen interest limits seem likely to emerge from the process.

Harrelson notes that he’s urging Democrats to reject Green Party Rep. Richard Carroll’s proposal to remove archaic language from the Constitution that discriminates against atheists. Such measures have already been ruled unconstitutional, Harrelson notes, and why give political opponents an opportunity to say you’re soft on atheists?

Advertisement

The same argument was made — but thankfully it didn’t prevail — back when the legislature decided to strip the Constitution of court-invalidated segregationist provisions. Though some thought it pointless, the amendment was put on the ballot and voters approved it, narrowly. The symbolism was important. So it is with Carroll’s proposal.

 

Advertisement

Help to Keep Great Journalism Alive in Arkansas

Join the fight for truth and become a subscriber of the Arkansas Times. We've been battling powerful forces for 50 years through our tough, determined, and feisty journalism. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, our readers value great journalism. But we need your help to do even more. By subscribing and supporting our efforts, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers to expand our coverage. Together, we can continue to hold the powerful accountable and bring important stories to light. Subscribe now or donate for as little as $1 and be a part of the Arkansas Times community.

Previous article DNA databases Next article Wednesday To-Do: Mudvayne