Order in the court -- and no short skirts | Arkansas Blog

Friday, May 22, 2009

Order in the court -- and no short skirts

Posted By on Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM

Funny story in the New York Times today about a judicial panel in Indianapolis concerning courtroom attire. It has set off some  stout web rejoinders, primarily because male judges made a number of remarks about female attorneys in revealing clothing.

Sexist pigs, said some. Other MCPs defended them, naturally.

I've heard lots of stories about courtroom attire,, but they tend to be about outfits worn by parties and witnesses -- the likes of wifebeaters, T-shirts with vulgar slogans, shorts, flipflops. In other words, about what you see at the average Arkie McDonald's.

Judge Michael P. McCuskey, chief judge of the federal district court for the Central District of Illinois and a member of the panel, said that at moot court competitions in law schools, he had seen participants wearing “skirts so short that there’s no way they can sit down, and blouses so short there’s no way the judges wouldn’t look.”

.... As the story made its way around the Internet, readers rushed in to fire shots of their own. At the website of the American Bar Association’s ABA Journal, one woman parodied the male judges’ comments: “I’m sorry Sugar, I’d love to listen to what you’re saying, but I have a penis. As such, I am only able to use one sense at a time.” She added, “What garbage! Poor men can’t control themselves, so women have to respond.”

So what about it, readers. Courtroom garb stories?

UPDATE: From a district court judge:

I am always partial to folks who show up in court for a DWI sentencing in Budweiser and Miller Lite t-shirts. And, then there was the guy who had on the shirt emblazoned with "If assholes could fly, this place would be an airport."


Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Trump's 'deal' on wall and dreamers is no bargain

    Donald Trump unveiled his great plan today — temporary protection for "dreamers" in return for  $5.7 billion worth of wall — but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has already explained why it falls short and some on is side are already crying "no amnesty."
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • An open line for reproductive justice

    Rain drove the speakers inside to the old Senate chamber at the state Capitol, but the rally for reproductive justice went on today as does the fight in a state where the majority who assemble at the Capitol most often act to restrict women's medical rights. The line is open on this and other topics.
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • Cotton, Boozman propose estate tax bonanza for billionaires

    Tom Cotton and John Boozman are dishonestly touting legislation that is a bonanza for the super wealthy as help for small businesses and farmers.
    • Jan 19, 2019
  • More »

Readers also liked…


Most Recent Comments


© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation