Taking out the trash? | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Taking out the trash?

Posted By on Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:55 PM

Perhaps you saw the story in this morning's Democrat-Gazette (no link available) about the city of Little Rock possibly looking at privatizing the city's landfill. The article talks about the logistics involved, as well as some of the complications with putting out an RFP for such services (i.e. the landfill already has more than $14 million in debt). The article does mention the only other landfill currently operating in the city, the BFI landfill that, as you may remember, caused such a stink (literally) earlier this year that neighbors complained. The landfill was accepting drilling waste from natural gas drillers in the Fayetteville Shale.  The city passed an ordinance preventing BFI from doing so, but BFI sued and a circuit judge ruled that Little Rock did not have the authority to retroactively apply such an ordinance. You can read that opinion here

What the article didn't mention is that BFI, who would more than likely bid on the city's RFP for the landfill, will probably seek damages from the city in a separate trial in May of 2010, around the same time their current facility is scheduled to close. One attorney for the landfill said the company lost $60,000 per day because of the ordinance. The city has not appealed the circuit court decision, but likely will if BFI decides to pursue damages.

Now, the interesting question is whether BFI will be allowed to bid on the city's RFP.  Could the company use the threat of pursuing damages to curry favor with the city from whom they hope to acquire the landfill? City attorney Tom Carpenter says that is a valid concern.

"There’s been more than one board member that has wondered why they would be allowed to bid," he says. "We’ve got a rule, for example, that attorneys who are involved in suits against the city are not allowed to seek city business. And there’s been questions like, if there’s someone seeking damages against the city in this line of business, do we have to allow them to bid? That will be a policy decision the board will have to make. But if the board does make that a policy like they’ve done in other contexts, then they probably wouldn’t be eligible to bid."

It's a tricky situation, and one that we'll be keeping an eye on.

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Gerard Matthews

Readers also liked…

  • Federal judge reprimands John Goodson for misconduct in class-action case

    John Goodson  — the Texarkana attorney, D.C. lobbyist, and husband of Arkansas State Supreme Court Justice Courtney Goodson — was reprimanded today by a federal judge for his conduct in a class-action case.
    • Aug 3, 2016
  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments


© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation