Robocalls: Are they legal? UPDATE | Arkansas Blog

Monday, May 10, 2010

Robocalls: Are they legal? UPDATE

Posted By on Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:39 PM

Robocalls have begun, I understand, including some lowdown stuff in one judicial race. Such calls have defied tracing in the past, though they're clearly paid political communication intended to affect election outcomes.

But here's something a friend just discovered: Are the calls legal? Read the state statute (on the jump) and you tell me:

UPDATE: Coincidentally, the state attorney general today settled a lawsuit over robocalls used for purely commercial purposes. Jason Tolbert reports on that here and reports an ambiguous response from the attorney general's office on political robocalls. A spokesman acknowledges the state law but notes a belief that federal law pre-empts it. I can see a potential constitutional problems in limiting political speech through this statute. But I wonder: If we have a law, shouldn't we enforce it until it's struck down or removed from the books? Mr. A.G.?

UPDATE II: A political consultant who uses robocalls says they are clearly protected by federal law, but disclosure of sponsor is required in federal races. I've been hearing about calls from unidentified sources. That's the part that chaps me, not the calls themselves. Who's paying for them?

5-63-204. Automated telephone solicitation.
(a) (1) It is unlawful for any person to use a telephone for the purpose of offering any
goods or services for sale, or for conveying information regarding any goods or services for the purpose of soliciting the sale or purchase of the goods or services, or for soliciting information, gathering data, or for any other purpose in connection with a political campaign when the use involves an automated system for the selection and dialing of telephone numbers and the playing of recorded messages when a message is completed to the called number.


(2) However, nothing in this section prohibits the use of:
(A) A telephone involving an automated system for the selection and
dialing of telephone numbers and the play of recorded messages to:
(i) Inform the purchaser of the goods or services concerning
receipt and availability of the goods or services for delivery to the purchaser; or
(ii) Convey information concerning any delay or pertinent
information about the current status of any purchase order previously made; or
(B) An automated telephone system with a recorded message when the
call is made or message given solely in response to a call initiated by the person to which the automatic call or recorded message is directed.
(b) Any person who violates any provision of this section upon conviction is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor and shall be punished accordingly.
(c) (1) The Attorney General, a prosecuting attorney, any law enforcement officer, or
any telephone company serving an area from which automated telephone calls are made may seek injunctive relief to enforce the provision of this section.
(2) If a civil action is filed pursuant to this section, the prevailing party is entitled
to a reasonable attorney's fee and court costs.

History. Acts 1981, No. 947, §§ 1-3; A.S.A. 1947, §§ 41-4162 — 41-4164.

Case Notes
Cited: Potomac Leasing Co. v. Vitality Ctrs., Inc., 290 Ark. 265, 718 S.W.2d 928 (1986).

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (11)

Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-11 of 11

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Artist Dale Chihuly's court battle

    Dale Chihuly, the visionary artist whose work is currently on exhibit at Crystal Bridges, is the subject of a New York Times feature today about an ongoing court battle and the condition of the 75-year-old artist.
    • Aug 22, 2017
  • Troubles mount for Sen. Jake Files. Maybe others, too

    Sen. Jakes Files has serious problems, based on an FBI affidavit filed Monday in Fort Smith. One new question is how many other legislators have problems based on spending of state surplus money?
    • Aug 22, 2017
  • Confederate memories of a Southern boy

    Confederate memories. How a Son of the South went wrong — or right, depending on your point of view.
    • Aug 21, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Jason Rapert vs. Wikipedia

    Sen. Jason Rapert against the world: Wikipedia edition.
    • Jan 23, 2016
  • Among the last words from Kenneth Williams: 'Finger Lickin' Good Fried Chicken'

    What's purported to be a final-words essay from condemned prisoner Kenneth Williams was distributed today by Deborah Robinson, a freelance journalist in Arkansas.  He reflects on his execution, his victims, reactions of inmates and big servings of fried chicken, which he says are given to all inmates on execution days.
    • Apr 27, 2017
  • Super Bowl line

    Over to you.
    • Feb 7, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

  • Troubles mount for Sen. Jake Files. Maybe others, too

    Sen. Jakes Files has serious problems, based on an FBI affidavit filed Monday in Fort Smith. One new question is how many other legislators have problems based on spending of state surplus money?
  • Confederate memories of a Southern boy

    Confederate memories. How a Son of the South went wrong — or right, depending on your point of view.
  • Artist Dale Chihuly's court battle

    Dale Chihuly, the visionary artist whose work is currently on exhibit at Crystal Bridges, is the subject of a New York Times feature today about an ongoing court battle and the condition of the 75-year-old artist.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation