Murkowski resolution fails | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Murkowski resolution fails

Posted By on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:50 PM

A resolution to block the EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gases failed in the senate today 47-53. Six Democrats including, you guessed it, Sens. Mark Pryor and Blanche Lincoln voted for the resolution that would have made it impossible for the EPA to regulate gases the agency considers a danger to public health. Evan Bayh, Ben Nelson, Jay Rockefeller and Mary Landrieu also voted for the resolution. Nao Ueda, communications director for the Arkansas Clean Energy Works Coalition, had this to say:

We are delighted that the Murkowski Resolution failed to pass the Senate. We, however, are extremely disappointed that both senators from Arkansas voted to support the resolution. The resolution would have had terrible environmental and economic repercussions for this country. The impact of greenhouse gases on the environment is clear. If successful, the Murkowski Resolution would have undone the historic agreement reached between the Obama administration and automakers in 2009 to make American vehicles more fuel efficient. Automakers were hit hard by the recent recession, and it is cruel to introduce to them new vehicle efficiency standards only to roll them back a year later. Most importantly, the Murkowski Resolution would have cost Arkansas consumers $12 million at the pump. We applaud 53 courageous senators who sided with American people, but we are saddened that Arkansas senators were not among them.

The vote was probably a smart, albeit misguided, one for Pryor. President Obama has said he would not sign the bill into law and by the time the senator comes up for re-election everyone will have forgotten about this. Plus, he gets to tell the Chamber of Commerce, Farm Bureau, etc. that he voted with them.

UPDATE: Good column by Joe Conason on how Lincoln's vote was a slap in the face to Bill Clinton, an advocate of better environmental policiies, who helped her immensely in her re-election campaign.

Widely regarded as a blatant and mindless political attack on science, the Murkowski-Lincoln resolution is also a rebuke to Clinton and everyone who shares his view that climate change is the most important challenge facing the world in this century. The former president has repeatedly urged Senate Democrats to pass serious cap-and-trade or carbon tax legislation by whatever means necessary, including the now-controversial method of reconciliation. He often speaks in apocalyptic terms on the topic, as he did last year when he said that "Congress must pass, and the president must sign, legislation that puts a price on carbon and establishes a cap and trade system ... properly pricing something that is otherwise going to destroy the planet."

Michael Tomasky also sees a big f*** you to progressives in Lincoln's vote for more pollution.

Tags: , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (13)

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

More by Gerard Matthews

Readers also liked…

  • Auditor Lea caught not telling the truth

    State Auditor Andrea Lea, who began her tenure in statewide office with a degree of competence unseen in some other Republican counterparts (think Treasurer Dennis Milligan particularly), is becoming more deeply mired in a political scandal.
    • Mar 4, 2016
  • Another Republican miracle-working governor

    Great piece in Washington Post on the budget crisis in Louisiana. Big tax cuts and corporate welfare will do that to a state, particularly to a state whose previous governor, Republican Bobby Jindal, refused to join the Obamacare-funded Medicaid expansion. There's a lesson there for Arkansas.
    • Mar 4, 2016
  • More on how highways were used to wipe out "blight" of non-white neighborhoods

    Vox, a news website that concerns itself with energy and other issues, has a fine piece, including before and after images, on the history of the U.S. interstate system and why roads were built through the middle of cities (unless people of influence stopped them — see Manhattan, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.)
    • Mar 22, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

  • UPDATE: Amazon's HQ2: Today is Little Rock's big reveal. Likely a no-go

    Thinking positive in advance of Little Rock's announcement of its response to Amazon's request for bids to host a new headquarters. Perhaps it will just be an announcement for a new city promotional campaign.
  • If Cotton tapped for CIA, then what?

    Times columnist Jay Barth speculates this week on the fallout should Sen. Tom Cotton be appointed as Donald Trump's CIA director (itself only speculation at this point).
  • Little Rock to reveal bid for Amazon headquarters

    Thursday is the deadline for cities to make a pitch for Amazon's second headquarters and Little Rock will unveil its proposal at a 10:30 a.m. news conference Thursday in the Venture Center in the city's Technology Park development on Main Street.
  • Ole Miss apologizes to Houston Nutt, settles his lawsuit

    Tom Mars, attorney for Houston Nutt, the former Arkansas and Ole Miss football coach, called my attention this morning to news that Nutt had settled his lawsuit against Ole Miss officials for speaking negatively about him despite a no-disparagement agreement with the school following his departure as head coach.
  • Environmental group finds agricultural chemicals in Arkansas drinking water

    The Environmental Working Group released a report this week that asserts that the drinking water for about 200,000 Arkansans contains unsafe levels of chemicals related to industrial agriculture. Another environmental group has used the occasion to call for Tyson Foods to do something about it.

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation