Jim Keet's legal problems | Arkansas Blog

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Jim Keet's legal problems

Posted By on Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:34 AM

The Democrat-Gazette today ran through the Jim Keet residency issue, which I first wrote about some weeks ago. Basics are the same. The Constitution requires seven years of residency for a governor. Must it be consecutive or does cumulative residency count? Keet, the Republican nominee who spent 2003-08 in Florida, thinks the Constitution doesn't bar him. I think a court would be loathe to toss Keet should someone challenge his residency, which Gov. Mike Beebe's campaign doesn't intend to do. On the jump, I pass along a lawyer's take on this question, favorable to Keet.

But here's the thing that is not ambiguous: Keet continues to insist, contrary to a later date that he told me, that he moved to Arkansas in August 2008. He then cast an absentee ballot in Florida in November 2008. I don't know why he's insisting on sticking to that August move date rather than early 2009, as he told me (the motivation might be an interesting question). But by doing so, he's made a prima facie case that he cast an illegal vote in Florida in November 2008. A Florida resident who moves is permitted to cast an absentee ballot only if he moves AFTER the registration books have closed in his new state. They were open in Arkansas through early October in 2008. Keet moved before the books closed, by his own, repeated, account.

BEECHCRAFT BONANZA: Photo of plane similar to Jim Keets.
  • BEECHCRAFT BONANZA: Photo of plane similar to Jim Keet's.
Keet's bigger problem is the song-and-dance he's run through to justify failure to pay property taxes the last few years (as many as five) on a $135,000 Beechcraft airplane. The plane is owned by a Nevada corporation based in Clark County (Las Vegas). Keet has given the D-G an alibi about easier registration in Nevada, uncertainty about whether assessment is required in some Nevada counties, a bookkeeper's bad advice and other verbal noise to cover his tax avoidance. But there are obvious problems in the story. The plane WAS assessed in Pulaski County. Then Keet got it taken off the books in 2005 by telling the Pulaski assessor he'd moved to Florida. But the plane is not assessed in Florida. Where does Nevada come in to begin with? And why was it not assessed in Arkansas until the D-G caught Keet? Keet certainly knew about taxes in Arkansas through 2005.

It is not exactly true, as Keet told the D-G, that some counties don't assess planes in Nevada. Here's the rule in Clark County on airplane assessment. An advisory from the Carson City assessor puts it in plain language:

Aircraft are assessed by the county in which they are physically based. If the aircraft shares time between counties or states the applicable governmental entities can share the assessment and taxes.

In other words, yes, you can avoid assessment and taxes in Nevada if a plane is physically based elsewhere. But it does not free you from taxes in those other jurisdictions. As an Arkansas judge once learned, it can be considered fraud to register property in another state as a means of avoiding taxes. I'm not leveling that charge here, but I do note that Jim Keet has been a resident of Arkansas, according to him, for two years. During that time he did not pay taxes on a plane based here and he has used as an excuse registration in another state. Problematic.


Assuming the court found Art. 6, sec. 5 (Qualifications of Governor) ambiguous, basic rules of statutory construction would take over. One of the basics is that you look at a statute (or Constitutional provision) alongside other similar statutes to determine the intent behind the vague one. Here, Art. 5, sec. 5, (Qualifications of House and Senate) explicitly states that the residency requirement is for the time preceding the election. Likewise, Amendment 80, sec. 16, says that judges have to have been licensed attorneys in this state for X years immediately preceding taking office. My guess is that the Court would determine that, because the drafters of the Constitution didn't put the temporal restriction on the Governor that they did on the House/Senate, it was purposefully omitted, and cumulative years as an Arkansas citizen are what matter. This is bolstered by the interpretive canon that you cannot add implied words to a statute if the statute makes sense without the implied words.

Tags: , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (14)

Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-14 of 14

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Arming teachers: An insurance complication

    Gun lovers in the Arkansas legislature are spoiling to put more guns in classrooms at the earliest opportunity. Today, the Washington Post reports a complication — from insurance companies.
    • May 27, 2018
  • Razorbacks plan a return to real grass in 2019

    I don't know why the news of a return to real grass at Razorback stadium seemed like such good news to me. Old fogey, I guess.
    • May 27, 2018
  • Crowds increase at RiverFest day 2

    Crowds grew on day two of RiverFest, the privately re-imagined version of the old Memorial Day weekend Little Rock music festival.
    • May 27, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • The inspiring Hillary Clinton

    Hillary Clinton's campaign for president illustrates again the double standard applied to women. Some writers get it. They even find the supposedly unlikable Clinton inspiring.
    • Oct 16, 2016
  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016
  • Your daily dose of Jason Rapert

    Sen. Jason Rapert really, really didn't like it when a KATV reporter asked him about the hypocrisy of his political arguments.
    • Feb 4, 2017

Most Viewed

  • Arming teachers: An insurance complication

    Gun lovers in the Arkansas legislature are spoiling to put more guns in classrooms at the earliest opportunity. Today, the Washington Post reports a complication — from insurance companies.

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation