Autogate: Was suit a good idea? | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Autogate: Was suit a good idea?

Posted By on Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:25 AM

An elected Republican official tells me he/she was not consulted nor were many other Republicans in his/her circle before the Republican Party sued yesterday over the state cars provided constitutional officers and the House speaker. The thinking from this quarter was that the suit was ill-advised. It's nakedly political. An existing lawsuit already presents a non-partisan attack on the broader question of use of state cars for personal purposes. Republican Party Chair Doyle Webb is not exactly a poster child for ethical behavior. Even the Democrat-Gazette editorial page, though no defender of freebies, has indicated the lawsuit is screwy.

I was kind of surprised to hear the party's insider's view. Maybe it's a lonely point of view. Conventional wisdom certainly seems to be that you can't beat up politicians enough over perks, big or small.

As I've said before, I think you can make a case that the cars, when used personally (and it's just about impossible to avoid when you have a state vehicle) might be an unconstitutional pay enhancement. I do think Webb is wrong to dismiss the argument that, if that's so, retirement and health benefits are also illegal. Webb says these are non-taxable fringe benefits and thus not an income supplement. (And lots of Republican officeholders benefit from them and he wouldn't want to sue THEM.) Retirement contributions certainly are designed to become income.

Webb figured, correctly, that he'd reap a bonanza of news coverage by suing and there's no media like free media. Since this has been the Democrat-Gazette's story, it is sure to blow it out every time the subject is raised. This morning, it led the newspaper with the GOP's follow-through on its pre-announced intention to sue. The newspaper editor's position on lawsuits has generally been that anybody can file a lawsuit. The mere filing of one is, thus, not such a big deal.

Much as I think state cars are justified for only a small number of employees who must use them constantly in their work, I think the broader question of the overall state fleet (particularly that bodacious Game and Fish motor pool — a state car in every garage) is the much more important point than Charlie Daniels' Buick.

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (13)

Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-13 of 13

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Judge anticipates punishment of lawyers in Fort Smith class action case

    Federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith issued a 32-page ruling yesterday indicating he contemplates punishment of 16 lawyers who moved a class action lawsuit against an insurance company out of his court to a state court in Polk County after a settlement had been worked out.
    • Apr 15, 2016
  • Your daily dose of Jason Rapert

    Sen. Jason Rapert really, really didn't like it when a KATV reporter asked him about the hypocrisy of his political arguments.
    • Feb 4, 2017
  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016

Most Shared

  • Discussion: State killing of the mentally ill

    The Arkansas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty and others will have a forum on mental illness and the death penalty at 6:30 p.m. Monday at the Bowen School of Law's Friday Courtroom.

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation