Transparency in the Fayetteville shale | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Transparency in the Fayetteville shale

Posted By on Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:41 AM

Environmentalist Shawn Porter contends that the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission rule on disclosure of chemicals used in fracking to tap gas deposits in the Fayetteville shale isn't sufficiently transparent. (As noted here, while Arkansas has proposed requiring disclosure of specific chemicals used, it will allow companies to keep secret the formulas for mixing the chemicals in each well.)

Porter writes a call for objection to the Commission's adoption of the rule without further public hearings.

At a public meeting in Guy, AR (November 9, 2010), Ar Oil and Gas Commission director Larry Bengal went on record stating that chemicals used in fracking would be publicly disclosed in Rule B-19. The AOGC also had a draft of the rule on the AOGC website till the day of the meeting held on December 7th to consider the rule and receive public input.

Unknown to the public, a revised draft (mark-up) was passed out at the meeting that had been changed from the original draft markup on the AOGC website. The revised draft allowed drilling companies to continue withholding information about chemicals used in fracking, calling them proprietary trade secrets. AOGC now says it is prepared to implement the new rule on Jan 15, in spite of the fact that the public never had an opportunity to comment on the final mark-up.

Public disclosure of fracking chemicals lies at the heart of any attempt to hold gas and drilling companies responsible for damage to water and health. AOGC and industry will succeed in keeping that information private unless this key provision in rule B-19 is revised.

AOGC should be challenged and a stay issued to stop the rule from going into effect without full public disclosure of fracking chemicals. We know from studies in other states these fracking compounds are carcinogenic and contain endocrine disrupting compounds. This agency must be held accountable for playing a shell game with its own rulemaking process. Where is the AG's office when the public interest and welfare is at stake? Hiding their heads in the fracking sand?

- Shawn Porter

Tags: , , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (7)

Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Bipartisan deal to continue subsidies Trump ended. But ...

    Everyone's reporting that Sens. Patty Murray and Lamar Alexander have struck a bipartisan deal on to continue federal subsidies for health coverage that Donald Trump cut off.
    • Oct 17, 2017
  • Tuesday: Open line, news roundup

    The open line, plus the day's news roundup.
    • Oct 17, 2017
  • James Lee Witt corrects Trump on grade for Puerto Rico relief effort

    Donald Trump twice yesterday used James Lee Witt, Bill Clinton's widely hailed FEMA director and now in the private business of assisting in disasters, as a reference on the work he's done responding to hurricanes this year. Media, particularly on the conservative end, have echoed the Trump remarks.But hold on: Witt wasn't talking about Puerto Rico.
    • Oct 17, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • Little Rock school activists announce events for 60th anniversary of Central High crisis

    The group is not affiliated with the official "Reflections of Progress" commemoration of the 60th anniversary. However, at least two of the Little Rock Nine may be joining the group for an event at 2:30 p.m. at the state Capitol in the Old Supreme Court Chamber.
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • More on how highways were used to wipe out "blight" of non-white neighborhoods

    Vox, a news website that concerns itself with energy and other issues, has a fine piece, including before and after images, on the history of the U.S. interstate system and why roads were built through the middle of cities (unless people of influence stopped them — see Manhattan, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.)
    • Mar 22, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation