Spotlight: Arkansas legislature's pay supplements | Arkansas Blog

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Spotlight: Arkansas legislature's pay supplements

Posted By on Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:30 AM

The Blue Hog Report made a fine political point the other day by highlighting the Republican bloc that was standing in way of tiny state spending increases, including a piddly $6,000 for the Arkansas School for the Deaf. These same penny-pinching Republicans, he recounted in detail, are scoring up to $24,000 a year or so in "reimbursements" for alleged home office expenses. There is no accountabiility for these payments. Nearly all of the lawmakers set up dummy fronts to accept the money. It is generally understood that these payments are just an artifice to get around the constitutional limit on legislative pay.

Blue Hog (Matt Campbell), is back today with a useful and extensive background piece on the practice. It's a bipartisan outrage. Democrats and Republicans alike line their pockets with this money. (Undoubtedly, some of them might be able to make the case that they have some legitimate expenses for legislative work that these payments defray, but you won't find an accounting of it in the Capitol. It's not required.) Blue Hog notes the sloppy nature of the paper fronts set up to scoop the cash. Some have been dissolved. At least one, Rep. Ed Garner's bakery, has been dissolved and is also the source of an ongoing state tax collection embarrassment for the supposed deficit hawk.

A tip of the hat to two legislators, Sen. David Johnson of Little Rock and Rep. Nate Steel of Nashville, who do not draw the pay enhancements. There may be one or two more. Here's the issue as Blue Hog sees it:

Salary padding, of course, presents a legal issue. As already noted, Amendment 70 explicitly prohibits legislators from receiving additional income from their service in the General Assembly. Yet, to the extent that the reimbursements claimed under the statute go beyond actual costs incurred in a given month, what could you call that money other than “income”? After all, a “reimbursement,” by definition, is repayment for costs incurred. Where costs were not incurred, or where the amount received exceeds those costs, the additional money is income, according to both the IRS and common sense.

What does receiving extra income under these statutes say to Arkansans, given both when the laws were put in place and the continued avarice and greed displayed in amending and abusing the system? More importantly, what can and should be done in response? It is an understatement to suggest that some changes are needed in how expenses are documented and repaid, of course. That is a given. What is not given, though, is how quickly these changes will be made; that answer almost certainly depends on how Arkansans react to the salary padding.

Illegal exaction lawsuit, anyone?

ALSO: The expense scam, Republican hypocrisy and pork barreling are all rolled up into John Brummett's today. You could sum it up this way: Money-wasting Secretary of State Mark Martin is a change exactly how?

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • Today in Trump: Obstruction of justice anyone?

    It's the New York Times with the news today. Fired FBI Director James Comey kept notes of his talks with Donald Trump. A memo he wrote in February after a meeting with Trump said the president asked him to shut down the investigation into Michael Flynn, his former national security adviser.
    • May 16, 2017
  • Saturday's open line

    Got any thoughts? Put them here.
    • May 21, 2016

Most Shared

  • ASU to reap $3.69 million from estate of Jim and Wanda Lee Vaughn

    Arkansas State University announced today plans for spending an expected $3.69 million gift in the final distribution of the estate of Jim and Wanda Lee Vaughn, who died in 2013 and 2015 respectively.
  • Bad health care bill, again

    Wait! Postpone tax reform and everything else for a while longer because the Senate is going to try to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act one more time before September ends and while it can do it with the votes of only 50 senators.
  • Sex on campus

    Look, the Great Campus Rape Crisis was mainly hype all along. What Vice President Joe Biden described as an epidemic of sexual violence sweeping American college campuses in 2011 was vastly overstated.
  • The inadequate legacy of Brown

    LRSD continues to abdicate its responsibility to educate poor black students.

Most Viewed

  • A Highway 10 traffic solution recommendation

    The Arkansas Department of Transportation has announced its preferences for interchange and other improvements along the Highway 10 corridor between Pleasant Valley Drive and Pleasant Ridge Road.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation