Spotlight: Arkansas legislature's pay supplements | Arkansas Blog

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Spotlight: Arkansas legislature's pay supplements

Posted By on Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 7:30 AM

The Blue Hog Report made a fine political point the other day by highlighting the Republican bloc that was standing in way of tiny state spending increases, including a piddly $6,000 for the Arkansas School for the Deaf. These same penny-pinching Republicans, he recounted in detail, are scoring up to $24,000 a year or so in "reimbursements" for alleged home office expenses. There is no accountabiility for these payments. Nearly all of the lawmakers set up dummy fronts to accept the money. It is generally understood that these payments are just an artifice to get around the constitutional limit on legislative pay.

Blue Hog (Matt Campbell), is back today with a useful and extensive background piece on the practice. It's a bipartisan outrage. Democrats and Republicans alike line their pockets with this money. (Undoubtedly, some of them might be able to make the case that they have some legitimate expenses for legislative work that these payments defray, but you won't find an accounting of it in the Capitol. It's not required.) Blue Hog notes the sloppy nature of the paper fronts set up to scoop the cash. Some have been dissolved. At least one, Rep. Ed Garner's bakery, has been dissolved and is also the source of an ongoing state tax collection embarrassment for the supposed deficit hawk.

A tip of the hat to two legislators, Sen. David Johnson of Little Rock and Rep. Nate Steel of Nashville, who do not draw the pay enhancements. There may be one or two more. Here's the issue as Blue Hog sees it:

Salary padding, of course, presents a legal issue. As already noted, Amendment 70 explicitly prohibits legislators from receiving additional income from their service in the General Assembly. Yet, to the extent that the reimbursements claimed under the statute go beyond actual costs incurred in a given month, what could you call that money other than “income”? After all, a “reimbursement,” by definition, is repayment for costs incurred. Where costs were not incurred, or where the amount received exceeds those costs, the additional money is income, according to both the IRS and common sense.

What does receiving extra income under these statutes say to Arkansans, given both when the laws were put in place and the continued avarice and greed displayed in amending and abusing the system? More importantly, what can and should be done in response? It is an understatement to suggest that some changes are needed in how expenses are documented and repaid, of course. That is a given. What is not given, though, is how quickly these changes will be made; that answer almost certainly depends on how Arkansans react to the salary padding.

Illegal exaction lawsuit, anyone?

ALSO: The expense scam, Republican hypocrisy and pork barreling are all rolled up into John Brummett's today. You could sum it up this way: Money-wasting Secretary of State Mark Martin is a change exactly how?

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Saturday's open line

    Got any thoughts? Put them here.
    • May 21, 2016
  • Today in Trump: Obstruction of justice anyone?

    It's the New York Times with the news today. Fired FBI Director James Comey kept notes of his talks with Donald Trump. A memo he wrote in February after a meeting with Trump said the president asked him to shut down the investigation into Michael Flynn, his former national security adviser.
    • May 16, 2017
  • The long and winding road: No exception yet for 30 Crossing

    The Arkansas highway department's representative on the Metroplan board of directors told the board today that the department is requesting an exception to the planning agency's cap on six lanes for its 30 Crossing project to widen Interstate 30 from six to 10 (and more) lanes.
    • Jun 29, 2016

Most Shared

  • Conflicts of interest in the legislatures

    The Center for Public Integrity and the Associated Press collaborated for a project aimed at highlighting state legislators whose lawmaking might be affected by private business interests.
  • Industrial hemp pilot program coming soon to Arkansas

    One of the booths at this week's Ark-La-Tex Medical Cannabis Expo was hosted by the Arkansas Hemp Association, a trade group founded to promote and expand non-intoxicating industrial hemp as an agricultural crop in the state. AHA Vice President Jeremy Fisher said the first licenses to grow experimental plots of hemp in the state should be issued by the Arkansas State Plant Board next spring.
  • Cats and dogs

    I've always been leery of people who dislike animals. To my wife and me, a house without dog hair in the corners and a cat perched on the windowsill is as barren as a highway rest stop. We're down to three dogs and two cats, the smallest menagerie we've had for years.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Wildfire near Buffalo River contained

    • It is dry here, Doigotta, with steady 25 mph winds that are gusting in the…

    • on December 11, 2017
  • Re: The Medicaid charade explained

    • Hello I'm Cindy Nancy..i have been looking forward for a real and genuine loan company,Until…

    • on December 11, 2017
  • Re: The Medicaid charade explained

    • Urgent Affordable loan. search no more. contacting the right company for legitimate loan lender have…

    • on December 11, 2017

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation