Supreme Court rebuffs SWEPCO plant challenge | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Supreme Court rebuffs SWEPCO plant challenge

Posted By on Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:11 AM

The Turk plant under construction in 2009.
  • The Turk plant under construction in 2009.

The hunting club fighting the SWEPCO coal-fired generating plant in Hempstead County lost a major round before the state Supreme Court today.

The Supreme Court said the Hempstead County Hunting Club, which has argued that the plant is unnecessary and environmentally damaging, had not exhausted avenues to appeal the plant's approval before the state Public Service Commission. Until that avenue is exhausted, the court said, it cannot consider arguments that the plant wasn't properly permitted.

Here's the court's decision, written by Judge Karen Baker. Baker authored the Court of Appeals ruling that blocked the building of the Turk Plant because SWEPCO had not obtained a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need. The Supreme Court upheld that ruling.

In the face of that decision, SWEPCO moved to build the plant under an exemption granted "merchant" power plants, which don't recover costs through retail rates in the state but through wholesale power sales. The Supreme Court said the Hempstead Hunting Club had failed to object to that change of status at the PSC. The hunting club argued that courts had concurrent jurisdiction to consider this issue, but the Supreme Court rejected the argument.

Hempstead Hunting Club, the court said, "is not without remedies; it simply must exhaust those remedies before seeking judicial relief."

The court said it would also be up to the PSC first to consider two questions the hunting club raised:

1) Having first applied for a certificate of environmental capability, had SWEPCO effectively waived its ability to go another route and seek an exemption for merchant power plants?

2) Is, even if exempted, SWEPCO still required to seek a certificate of convenience and necessity?

Federal and environmental appeals continue on the $2 billion plant, which is continuing to be built.

I'm seeking reactions.

Tags: , , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (18)

Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-18 of 18

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Arkansas: Land of .......

    Welcome to Arkansas: Land of cowardly politicians, discriminatory laws, inhumane turkey drops and lots and lots of Trump voters.
    • Oct 8, 2016
  • The inspiring Hillary Clinton

    Hillary Clinton's campaign for president illustrates again the double standard applied to women. Some writers get it. They even find the supposedly unlikable Clinton inspiring.
    • Oct 16, 2016
  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: An open line, plus an endorsement

    • I don't know if any of you are fans of the show "Madame Secretary", but…

    • on May 20, 2018
  • Re: An open line, plus an endorsement

    • You're right Olphart. It has been about a month since we've heard anything from Doigotta…

    • on May 20, 2018
  • Re: An open line, plus an endorsement

    • Has Doigotta embarked on an around the world tour, too? Haven't heard from her lately…

    • on May 20, 2018



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation