Talking points on tax development slush fund | Arkansas Blog

Friday, June 17, 2011

Talking points on tax development slush fund

Posted By on Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:04 PM

I wrote a column this week about Mayor Mark Stodola's explanation of the need for a $40 million economic development slush fund in the city's $500 million sales tax increase proposal.

It would appear he and the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce, the driving force for this money, need to get their talking points together. Stodola was hazy on details, but said the Little Rock Port and some other areas needed $25 million for expansion. He also mentioned a need for money to put into the research development project touted by UAMS and UALR.

I've been supplied the Chamber of Commerce's own talking points. Full copy on jump, but it says the tax would provide $23 million for the research park (direct taxpayer subsidy of private enterprise), $10 million for the port and $7 million for infrastructure work for new jobs. The talking points are silent on accountability, not a strong suit of the chamber. They are silent, too, about the types of jobs and industries acceptable to the chamber. Environmental commitments? Workplace quality commitments?

If you should get this spiel, I'd encourage you to ask for specifics on this job creation and private business investment numbers. I've found exaggerations and oversights in the so-called "reports" the Chamber makes on these topics to the city of Little Rock. These reports are in return for the $200,000 subsidy taxpayers give to people who work against universal health care, worker bargaining, decent workers comp programs and the public schools. I'd also like an accounting of jobs lost at companies given past incentives and taxpayer handouts and whether anybody ever tried to get a nickel back.

The worst thing about the talking points is that they openly encourage a destructive arms race. The chambers want sales taxes to promote economic development so they need not raise money from their members. A number of cities and counties have rolled right over. The LR Chamber is hungry for a similar tax here. We have a well-funded state agency that is supposed to oversee state development efforts fairly. It is lunacy for cities and counties in Arkansas, a poor state, to be taxing poor people's groceries to pay industrial blackmail. There hasn't been a serious study yet that shows corporate welfare is a serious factor in industrial location. The important things are location, raw materials, education of workforce, quality of life — not bribery.

I simply don't trust people who believe this with $40 million.

Meanwhile, mayor and chamber, get your stories straight.

Talking Points
Uses for Economic Development Funds$40 million of City capital tax funds over 8 years:

- $23 million for Research Park
- $10 million for Port of Little Rock expansion
- $ 7 million for infrastructure
incentives to recruit new jobs

The Research Park investment will help create and attract the jobs Little Rock wants for our future. Our medical industry is one of the largest job creation sectors in our economy. This Park will attract new companies while also providing much-needed incubator space for new technology being created at UAMS and UALR - all resulting in
high paying jobs for our citizens. These new jobs, at all skill and professional levels, will substantially increase Little Rock's tax base which further benefits the entire community.

Over 2100 new jobs have been announced at the Little Rock Port in the last 6 years. These advanced manufacturing jobs, and payroll, are the result of Little Rock's investment in creating and improving the Port over the last 30 years. Yet, we're out of land which means we cannot attract more new companies and jobs. This investment will "keep us in the game" in bringing new capital investment and high paying, advanced manufacturing jobs to Little Rock.

Our economic development partnership has resulted in expanded local industry and new company projects, representing over 7200 new jobs, being announced in our market during the last 6 years. Infrastructure incentives, state and local, are key to locating new projects here. Little Rock competes with major metropolitan cities for
these projects. If we cannot create infrastructure incentives, in partnership with the Governor's Quick Action Closing Fund and other State incentives, Little Rock will not be competitive and will lose projects to other communities, even those in Arkansas that have now passed a sales tax for economic development, and other states. The City Board would maintain strict control of these infrastructure incentive funds and vote on every incentive proposal to attract new jobs to Little Rock.

Little Rock's business community has invested over $2.5 million of private sector dollars in economic development work in the last 6 years - but recognizes it's now not enough to remain competitive. The Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce is raising even more private sector funds to increase the economic development program to
$1,500,000 annually for the next 5 years. This 100% annual increase over previous budgets is further commitment to the development of our economy and the creation of new jobs, at diverse skill levels, for all Little Rock citizens.

Tags: , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016
  • ADEQ denies C&H Hog Farm permit

    The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality has denied a new permit for the C&H Hog Farms' concentrated animal feeding operation near Mount Judea (Newton County). This is a big and somewhat surprising victory for critics who have viewed C&H's large-scale pig farm and the pig waste it generates as an existential threat to the Buffalo National River.
    • Jan 10, 2018
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation