Watershed meeting | Arkansas Blog

Monday, August 15, 2011

Watershed meeting

Posted By on Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:11 PM

  • Fernsler
On the whole, a very civil meeting at the Arkansas Studies Institute this afternoon to discuss the draft land use plan for the Lake Maumelle watershed. The meeting was the seventh public forum to discuss the draft plan. Another forum is scheduled for tonight at 7 p.m. at Winfield United Methodist Church, 20100 Highway 10. We've previously reported on clean water advocates' criticism of the plan and ongoing attempts to strike a balance between clean water and property rights in the watershed.

Details from today's meeting on the jump...

Tea Partiers and property-rights advocates were well represented — including one young man who got around to calling the Big Dam Bridge "the Big Dam Dog Poo Bridge that they wasted money on" — but so were the water watchdogs, who brought up questions about everything from the plan's allowances for medium-sized animal farming operations (farms with up to 299 beef cattle or 64,999 chickens would be allowed in the watershed under the proposed plan) to the removal of provisions limiting sub-surface mining, to the impact of trash-dumping visitors in a park proposed by Central Arkansas Water.

Mark White with White and Smith LLC and John Fernsler with WRT, who presented the plan to the group at the beginning of the meeting, seemed to spend extra time making a preemptive defense against charges that the land use plan would result in property rights infringement, pointing out that most current homeowners in the area wouldn't be affected.

One commenter asked whether a financial comparison had been done to study the difference between implementing the watershed protection plan and building a better water treatment plant to remove the pollutants from the reservoir if no plan was implemented. An official with CAW stood up and said that doing nothing would eventually require the construction of a "membrane" treatment plant, which would cost $200-$300 million on the low end, and possibly as much as $500 million.

"There is such a thing in this country beside property rights," said commenter Rel Corbin. "It's called the common good."

Tags: , , , , , ,


Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

More by David Koon

  • Blue smoke

    Since 1983, Little Rock's Nichols & Simpson Organbuilders has built a reputation for uncompromising excellence.
    • Mar 2, 2019
  • It's the Best and Worst 2018

    Our annual salute to weird, worrisome, wonderful Arkansas.
    • Dec 20, 2018
  • Fast forward in Blytheville

    The East Coast Timing Association held its Arkansas 1-Mile Challenge in September, where racers from all over the country mixed gasoline, steel and passion in the pursuit of raw speed.
    • Oct 11, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Little Rock school activists announce events for 60th anniversary of Central High crisis

    The group is not affiliated with the official "Reflections of Progress" commemoration of the 60th anniversary. However, at least two of the Little Rock Nine may be joining the group for an event at 2:30 p.m. at the state Capitol in the Old Supreme Court Chamber.
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • Trump tariffs hit farmers hard

    Well, the trade war has begun and the early returns for farmers are not good — sharp reductions in the prices for soybeans and corn. You may have heard that Arkansas, which overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump, has some agricultural interests, particularly in soybeans.
    • Jul 6, 2018
  • Arkansas legislature rejects bipartisan effort to study race relations

    On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council soundly rejected a bipartisan effort by two senators to to create a temporary legislative subcommittee to study race relations in the state.
    • Sep 15, 2017

Most Recent Comments


© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation