More details on North Little Rock tax suit settlement | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

More details on North Little Rock tax suit settlement

Posted By on Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:42 AM

The North Little Rock School District today provided me a copy of a letter it sent North Little Rock City Attorney Jason Carter proposing a settlement of the district's lawsuit over the city's tax increment finance district set up in late 2008.

Here it is. Carter said he had not received a copy of the Nov. 4 letter yet, though he confirmed he'd had a discussion on a settlement with Smith. I've sent it to him and he promises to try to get a city response. The suit is scheduled to go to trial next Wednesday. The North Little Rock School Board, which would have to approve a settlement of the suit, meets next Thursday.

Unless this is the first part of a process in which the city is expected to make a counter-offer, I can't readily see the city taking this deal. It would exclude all school district tax revenue in the TIF district from going into the TIF pot for potential improvements aimed at spurring further redevelopment. The city would also have to turn over to the schools money collected so far. That was the point of the lawsuit, particularly to prevent the city from capturing property taxes on the $30 million Enclave apartment project. ON THE OTHER HAND: Most lawyers I've talked with think the city has scant chance of prevailing in the lawsuit, particularly on procedural grounds, and saving face by a settlement would be useful. The TIF district would continue and capture some small revenue from the city and county.

The city met on New Year's Eve 2008 to create the gerrymandered district (extended along city streets although the law requires contiguous parcels of land) to include the Enclave before that property went on tax rolls at its new, higher assessment. Under TIF law, the value of property is frozen at the level that existed when a district is created. Future increases in value that produce increased taxes accrue to the benefit of the TIF district, not taxing entities. There are a number of small property millages — city and county, for example — affected, but the big school millage is the primary revenue-producer of TIF districts.

Settlements generally indicate both sides get something. The city's gain would be less tangible than the school district's, but it would still have its TIF district.

Tags: , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017
  • Campus gun bill clears committee

    The so-called compromise amendment that will allow anyone 25 or older with a training certificate carry a concealed weapon on public college campuses was approved in a Senate committee this afternoon.
    • Feb 21, 2017

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation