Kathy Wells of the Coalition of Greater Little Rock Neighborhoods reports on a new development in the campaign to beat a land use ordinance to protect the Lake Maumelle watershed. I wonder if the spending on this will turn up in any lobbyist’s report anywhere:

Not 48 hours after the Coalition amendments to protect our drinking water were attached to the proposed regs under consideration by the Pulaski Co. Quorum Court, opponents began phoning citizens and urging them to tell their JP to vote No on this Maumelle Watershed Zoning Code.

Wells is touting a Coalition compromise that grandfathers existing land uses and reduces allowable residential development until pollution controls are judged to be working. The coalition has a petition campaign underway.

Advertisement

UPDATE: Have an e-mail from a reader who claims to have received a phone call from a live caller about the coming Quorum Court action. The caller identified himself as representing Americans for Prosperity, the Koch-funded anti-tax, anti-environmental-regulation group that has been active on the anti-land-use-ordinance side of the debate. I’ve asked AFP about this. And about the caller’s script that said that if this measure passes people in Pulaski County will be required to remodel their houses. Yes, that’s what the caller is reported to have said. BUT NOTE THIS … the caller ID number on the call came from a number that, when you dial, gives a recorded message that says it is the number of the House Leadership PAC, another name for the House Republican Caucus. The voice on the message machine sounds a lot like Republican Rep. David Sanders of Little Rock, who opposes the clean water ordinance now pending before the Quorum Court. (Sanders said that might be his voice on the machine, because he was once an officer in the caucus, but he knows nothing about the phone bank.)

UPDATE II: Americans for Prosperity has not responded to my questions about specific calls, but it did send a news release pertaining to some kind of technical screwup in its calling campaign. Perhaps it’s a roundabout way to explain how a call, according to caller ID, came from a House Republican Caucus phone-number, which would suggest some co-ordination between AFP and political candidates, something AFP has always stoutly denied. Feel free to translate:

Advertisement

Be a part of something bigger

As a reader of the Arkansas Times, you know we’re dedicated to bringing you tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, we've been fighting the good fight in Little Rock and beyond – with your support, we can do even more. By becoming a subscriber or donating as little as $1 to our efforts, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers to expand our coverage and continue to bring important stories to light. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, it's clear that our readers value our great journalism. Join us in the fight for truth.

Previous article UPDATE: Ethics Commission won’t require disclosure on campaigns Next article Gus Malzahn stands by his woman