Occupy LR asks for support for good government; rejected | Arkansas Blog

Friday, March 16, 2012

Occupy LR asks for support for good government; rejected

Posted By on Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:46 AM

OCCUPY LITTLE ROCK: They propose a deal. But the city of Little Rock isnt receptive.
  • OCCUPY LITTLE ROCK: They propose a deal. But the city of Little Rock isn't receptive.

Occupy Little Rock has, according to reporting in the Democrat-Gazette, floated some ideas about moving its small demonstration encampment to a site less offensive to the eyes of City Director Lance Hines, who wants the blight removed from potential glimpse by speeding I-30 travelers. According to the account, Occupy LR said it might even move to private land if the city would pass a resolution condemning Citizens United, the U.S. Supreme Court decision that gave unlimited rein to corporate electioneering. Other major cities — including Portland, often cited here as an exemplar of urban development — have passed such resolutions.

City Manager Bruce Moore was not encouraging that the City Board of Directors would express official alarm at out-of-control corporate influence in governance.

Moore said he doubted the city would opt to denounce “corporate personhood.”

“We usually don’t engage in passing resolutions regarding Supreme Court decisions,” Moore said. “That would be new territory.”

CORRECTION: City Manager Moore says he was misquoted by the Democrat-Gazette and it carried a correctionin Saturday's newspaper about the direct quote relative to "corporate personhood." He tells me in an e-mail Saturday morning: "The main point of my comments is that we are reviewing all the options that were presented."

A clarification was needed because:

* The City Board most certainly does get into the resolution business. It was only December when the City Board passed a resolution — with backslaps all around — repealing a 1957 pro-segregation resolution. That December resolution did more than repudiate the 1957 seg resolution and, a half-century late, embrace the promise of the U.S. Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision. It also called for a review of city ordinances, resolutions and declarations that may “classify or reflect negatively upon citizens because of their race, religion, economic or ethnic background.” So, clearly, we DO do resolutions on constitutional topics.

Corporate influence? Corporations don't have to pay to influence Little Rock government. WE pay THEM. $200,000 a year to the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce, without accountability, to name just one handout among many. The Chamber ran the city's half-billion-dollar sales tax campaign and refused to say how the campaign money was spent. The Chamber now runs the publicly financed Technology Park Authority (including destroying public documents) that's about to tear hell out of an inner city neighborhood to build an office park that will be further subsidized by public money.

Want a resolution? See the Chamber. The Chamber of Commerce set up the task force that recommmended repeal of that seg resolution. See, it looks bad for business to be on record as opposing integration. Bad for business? You can imagine what the Chamber would say about a resolution opposing corporate influence in politics. You might as well ask them to condemn mother's milk.

I went down this road once before.

Bruce Moore's correct answer should have been:

"We do resolutions around here, just not resolutions that offend corporate sensibilities, particularly as reflected by the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce."

Given the corporate control of the majority of City Board seats, the assessment given in the newspaper, whether Moore said it or not, is absolutely correct politically, if not factually. Lance Hines, for example, would have to run such a resolution by his overlords at Deltic Timber. If you don't get my drift, see Leslie Peacock's post last night on Death Star Bob Johnson's bodacious rewrite of history on land protection in the Lake Maumelle watershed for context. In Johnson's world view, Deltic was looking out for the little guy when it tried to run roughshod over watershed protection through Johnson's office as senator.

OK, blood's boiling for the day.

Tags: , , , , , ,


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments (19)

Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • A response to police arrests becomes a tutorial on race, class and policing in Little Rock

    John Walker, the 79-year-old civil rights lawyer, and his associate, Omavi Shukur, 29, a young lawyer devoted to criminal justice reform, talked to press this afternoon about their arrests Monday by Little Rock police for supposedly obstructing governmental operations in observing and attempting to film a routine police traffic stop. It was a tutorial on sharp views of race, class and governance in Little Rock.
    • Sep 29, 2016
  • Donald Trump declares war on Hillary Clinton's marriage

    Donald Trump gave a remarkable interview to the New York Times yesterday in which he declared open season on the marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton's past infidelity. Seems like a loser, but I've been wrong before.
    • Oct 1, 2016
  • Arkansas: Land of .......

    Welcome to Arkansas: Land of cowardly politicians, discriminatory laws, inhumane turkey drops and lots and lots of Trump voters.
    • Oct 8, 2016

Most Viewed

  • The yawning teacher pay gap between Arkansas school districts

    Before Arkansas congratulates itself for outpacing Oklahoma on teacher pay, we should take a look at the huge disparity in salaries within the state. New teachers in Bentonville may make almost $46,000 a year, but new teachers in many other districts will start the 2018-19 school year earning $31,800 — less than the starting salary in Tulsa.
  • Anonymous Harding University students relaunch LGBTQ publication, campus security removes copies

    A group of anonymous Harding University students on Friday published an "HU Queer Press 2.0" zine, covering issues of gay rights at the private, Churches of Christ-affiliated campus in Searcy. A similar publication, "The State of the Gay at Harding University," set off a firestorm of controversy at Harding seven years ago. Shortly after the publication was distributed, campus security officers began gathering the copies of the zine and throwing them in the trash.

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation