Behind partisan posturing, a bottom line | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Behind partisan posturing, a bottom line

Posted By on Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:06 AM

Ernie Dumas' column this week says both parties are guilty of posturing in calling the roll on tax and spending measures with no chance of passage. Even those like Sen. Mark Pryor, who held himself above the fray in opposing a tax increase for millionaires, are just engaged in a different form of posturing.

But, Dumas notes, there is a bottom line. Republicans would give still more tax breaks to the wealthy — perhaps along withnew minimum taxes on the poor — and explode the deficit as the failed trickle-down plans always have done. Democrats would close the budget gap a little by making millionaires pay a little more than they do currently. Tax rates for business and individuals are lower than they've been in decades and, well, you know the results.

The full column:


Everyone in Congress who cared to go to the chamber cast a ceremonious but meaningless vote on taxes last week and then promptly boasted that they had struck a blow for the people.

The votes were meaningless only in the sense that neither the Senate nor House of Representatives tax bills had a chance of becoming law. They were public relations lagniappe served up in hopes of giving the parties a leg up in the fall elections.

That doesn’t mean that voters shouldn’t pay attention to the votes. They represent as well as anything could what people are apt to get from the next Congress in the way of debt reduction should one or the other party gain control.

The minority Republicans in the Senate, along with Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor, blocked passage of the president’s plan to require people making more than a million dollars a year to pay a 30-percent tax rate.

House Republicans countered the millionaire tax—the so-called Warren Buffett tax—with Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s “small-business tax cut.” It passed the House 235-173, with all four Arkansans, including Democrat Mark Ross, voting yes. It has no chance of passing the Senate. The House also voted ceremoniously to reject the Buffett tax with Ross again voting with the GOP.

Pryor, the only Democrat in the Senate to vote against the millionaire tax, explained that he was not necessarily against having millionaires pay a fair tax rate but these tax plans were political posturing by the parties and he was having none of it.

Standing above the fray is a form of posturing itself and, sadly for Pryor, it is not likely to stand him in good stead. Democrats and others who favor imposing a fairer tax on hedge-fund managers and others who use investment-profit loopholes to escape taxes thought his vote was cowardly, and Republicans only jeered.

Although they are only symbolic in the hopelessly divided Congress, the two measures reflect how the two parties in a new Congress would confront the looming issue of the budget deficits—basically whether they can be eliminated without more revenues, that is, more taxes.

The Buffett rule—the billionaire said his secretary should not be paying a higher percentage of her meager income in taxes than he did—would reduce the annual deficit by $47 billion while the House’s small-business tax cut would increase the deficit by $40 billion next year, the only year the businesses would receive the tax cut, although Republicans would likely insist on continuing it by saying that allowing it to expire would be a tax increase.

The Republicans claim the $40 billion in revenue loss would be partially offset by tax receipts from new wages and salaries that would flow when businessmen who enjoy the tax cuts next year invest their savings in new workers.

There is, by the way, a grudging acknowledgment lately by Republican leaders that eliminating deficits will require revenue increases as well as spending cuts, but they insist it will be done by “tax reform.” They haven’t identified the reforms, but Cantor last week explained his own idea of reform. Congress would require people with low to moderate incomes to pay federal income taxes even if large families and deductions for such things as high medical costs and mortgages leave them with no tax liability—a sort of alternative minimum tax on America’s poor.

But about that notion that the small-business tax cut—up to 20 percent for business owners with fewer than 500 employees—will cause an economic boom: It sounds fetching but it is nonsense, and it has been proven so for a couple of generations. Some 9.4 million owners of small businesses would reap tax cuts, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation, but 75 percent of the $40 million in tax savings would go to the richest 8 percent of businessmen. Income taxes on businesses are already the lowest in 80 years.

The theory of these supply-side tax cuts is that a businessman who sees his taxes reduced by a few thousand dollars for one year will decide to give it to someone else by hiring another worker. Businesses don’t hire a new worker just to be nice. They hire for one reason and one only: the new employee is needed to meet the demand for the business’s goods and services. No demand, no new employee.

Look, the supply-side theory has been amply tested and it didn’t work. The two big examples are President Reagan’s tax cut in 1981, which sharply lowered rates for high earners and corporations, and President George W. Bush’s successive rounds of tax cuts early in the last decade. They were sandwiched around President Clinton’s tax increase on upper incomes in 1993 to bring down the deficit and balance the budget (it did both). The tax cuts were sold as giant job creators, which would lead to higher tax collections and balanced budgets.

Everyone knows what happened both times: ballooning deficits.

But did the tax cuts produce the huge investment growth that was promised and that this year’s sponsors promise? Over the seven years after the Reagan tax cut, investment growth averaged 2.8 percent; after Bush’s tax cuts it averaged 2.7 percent. After Clinton’s tax increase, which Republicans warned would lead to another great depression, growth averaged 10.2 percent.



Comments (6)

Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-6 of 6

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Rutledge meddles in women's healthcare in Ohio

    Now Attorney General Leslie Rutledge is working to deprive Ohio women of healthcare. If her work in Arkansas is any indication, it won't be good for Ohio women.
    • Aug 13, 2018
  • State Hospital escapee captured in Memphis

    James Barrett,  who escaped from the Arkansas State Hospital Saturday was captured by U.S. marshals today at a Motel 6 in Memphis, KARK/Fox 16 reports.
    • Aug 13, 2018
  • Monday, Monday

    A slow start to the week. Here's the open line, plus some odds and ends of news and comment.
    • Aug 13, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Little Rock school activists announce events for 60th anniversary of Central High crisis

    The group is not affiliated with the official "Reflections of Progress" commemoration of the 60th anniversary. However, at least two of the Little Rock Nine may be joining the group for an event at 2:30 p.m. at the state Capitol in the Old Supreme Court Chamber.
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017

Most Viewed

  • Rick Crawford road tripping with Devin Nunes in Azerbaijan

    An Azerbaijan news agency reports on a visit from U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes, Donald Trump's protector on the House Intelligence Committee, along with committee member, Rep. Rick Crawford, a Republican from Arkansas's 1st Congressional District.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Monday, Monday

    • Nice leap, Sarge. I didn't say every one was faked, but you will note the…

    • on August 13, 2018
  • Re: Monday, Monday

    • Wrong, still, jhudd. This idiocy was pretty, and unlike the support you and Sarge might…

    • on August 13, 2018
  • Re: The open line: Checking the arc of the moral universe

    • Nice deflection, Sarge. When did I source Hannity? Ever. You, Sarge, right there, no different…

    • on August 13, 2018



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation