Hopeful signs for defeat of N.C. 'marriage' amendment | Arkansas Blog

Friday, April 27, 2012

Hopeful signs for defeat of N.C. 'marriage' amendment

Posted By on Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:45 AM

A strong campaign in opposition has produced some encouragement that North Carolina voters might defeat an anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment.

As happened in Arkansas, the amendment is about far more than "marriage," but about ending any sort of permissible civil domestic arrangement, with potentially harmful consequences including for some unmarried heterosexual couples. Same-sex marriage is already prohibited by North Carolina law and will remain so, pass or fail.

The key word is "marriage." Though growing majorities in the U.S. express support for civil unions, the word marriage remains a powerful vote mover. Opponents of equal rights for sexual minorities understand this perfectly and use the word as a wedge to further discriminate against sexual minorities. Surveying shows people in North Carolina haven't fully understood what the pending proposal is about. There's some evidence an opposition campaign is beginning to break through. Can North Carolina break the string of successes for constitutional discrimination? Seems unlikely, but at least there are some encouraging signs.

The “against side” [pollster Tom] Jensen alluded to is the Coalition to Protect NC Families, the organization powering the opposition campaign. On Monday, the coalition debuted its first two television ads with the intention of purchasing more air time before the May 8 vote. One ad features a mother who expresses fear over her daughter potentially losing health insurance benefits if Amendment One passes, while the other spot centers around a victim of domestic violence who explains how passage of the amendment could preclude her from legal protections against her former significant other. Both ads encapsulate the opposition campaign’s central message: the amendment would yield sweeping implications. Jeremy Kennedy, campaign manager for the Coalition to Protect NC Families, told TPM that he has tirelessly stressed that point to voters.

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (32)

Showing 1-32 of 32

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-32 of 32

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • The long and winding road: No exception yet for 30 Crossing

    The Arkansas highway department's representative on the Metroplan board of directors told the board today that the department is requesting an exception to the planning agency's cap on six lanes for its 30 Crossing project to widen Interstate 30 from six to 10 (and more) lanes.
    • Jun 29, 2016
  • El Dorado challenges state Board transfer decision; raises broad question about 'choice' vs. segregation

    The El Dorado School District HAS gone to federal court in response to the state Board of Education's approval, over El Dorado's objection, of the transfer of a white student from El Dorado to the majority white Parkers Chapel School District.
    • Aug 18, 2016
  • Satanic Temple: Make Rapert pay for Ten Commandments monument

    A petition drive has begun to encourage a demand that Sen. Jason Rapert pay for the legal fees in defending his Ten Commandments monument proposed for the state Capitol grounds. It's more work by the Satanic Temple, which has fought church-state entanglement around the country.
    • Aug 28, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation