Attorney general declines opinion on lottery contract | Arkansas Blog

Friday, June 29, 2012

Attorney general declines opinion on lottery contract

Posted By on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:38 PM

GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN: Ernie Passailaigue
  • GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN: Ernie Passailaigue
State Rep. Kim Hammer raised some interesting questions for Attorney General Dustin McDaniel in the form of an official opinion request.

In short, was it legal for former Lottery Director Ernie Passailiague's to unilaterally rewrite a contract with a lottery vendor, Scientific Gaming? Was it legal for the Lottery Commission to renegotiate that contract?

Is a civil lawsuit possible to recoup any of the money lost in lottery profits from the higher payments made to the vendor?

McDaniel said a review of state contracts is outside the power of his office's review function. Here's the full opinion.

Yes, but doesn't the attorney general sue private parties all the time for taking advantage of the state, such as drug companies?

What's the diff?

Others, I know, are looking into the question of whether legal action is worth pursuing here. Could Ernie P. write his own contracts? Does a cleanup of the contract months later really validate any illegal payments made in the interim? They sould like good questions to me.

Opinion Number: 2012-059 Date Sent: 06/29/2012
Requestor: Hammer, Kim
State Representative

Opinion: Did former Lottery Commissioner Ernie Passailaigue exceed his authority in negotiating and
renegotiating any terms of the original contract with Scientific Gaming Corporation? Q2) If it is deemed that former Director Passailaigue did exceed his authority, what civil action may be taken by the state to recoup any lost funds? Q3) Did the Arkansas Lottery Commission exceed its authority in renegotiating a contract with Scientific Gaming Corporation? Q4) If it is determined that former Director Passailaigue and/or the Lottery Commission exceeded their
authority in the contract negotiation process, does this void the existing contract without penalty to the state? Q5) Did Scientific Gaming Corporation violate any laws or contract agreements by signing the revised contract? Q6) Has Scientific Gaming Corporation, in the modifications of the original contract, created an option for the state to void the current contract in its entirety without cost to the state? Q7) Did changes in the original contract give an unfair advantage to Scientific Gaming Corporation in future renegotiations, including three (3) one-year options? Q8) Were "Tel-Sell" Operations part of the original contract? Q9) Do changes noted on page six (6) of twenty (20) of the State Auditor's report violate the terms of the original contract?

RESPONSE: These questions are outside the scope of my review in the context of an official
opinion. See A.C.A. § 25-16-706. The opinion writing function of this office generally does
not extend to such factual matters as the review of the terms of specific contracts or the
circumstances attending a contract's execution.

Tags: , ,


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Now, the main event

    I write Tuesday morning, before polls close on primary and judicial election contests.
    • May 24, 2018
  • Police identify remains as those of Ebby Steppach

    KARK/Fox 16 reports that Little Rock police have identified skeletal remains found Tuesday in a west Little Rock park as those of Ebby Steppach, the 17-year-old who's been missing since her car was found in that park abandoned in 2015.
    • May 23, 2018
  • UAMS presents balanced budget

    UAMS, pressed by financial problems for several years, told the University of Arkansas Board of Trustees today that it had a $1.5 billion operating budget that doesn't call for deficit spending.
    • May 23, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Donald Trump declares war on Hillary Clinton's marriage

    Donald Trump gave a remarkable interview to the New York Times yesterday in which he declared open season on the marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton's past infidelity. Seems like a loser, but I've been wrong before.
    • Oct 1, 2016
  • The inspiring Hillary Clinton

    Hillary Clinton's campaign for president illustrates again the double standard applied to women. Some writers get it. They even find the supposedly unlikable Clinton inspiring.
    • Oct 16, 2016
  • Arkansas Supreme Court refuses to rehear invalidation of marijuana act

    The Arkansas Supreme Court today denied a request to rehear its decision invalidating Issue 7, the medical marijuana initiated act.
    • Nov 3, 2016

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Slideshows

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation