Vote NO on Issue 2, another corporate welfare scheme | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Vote NO on Issue 2, another corporate welfare scheme

Posted By on Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:38 AM

A Talk Business/Hendrix poll today shows voters mostly in the dark on a legislatively proposed constitutional amendment that is a Trojan horse for yet another giveaway to real estate developers.

A NO vote is the proper option, as we've said before.

The poll says that 35 percent favor it, 35 percent oppose it and the rest are undecided. Not surprising. There's been no talk about it and no organized advertising so far. If any emerges, it will be a last-minute dishonest blitz from real estate developers anxious for approval of a deal by which compliant city and county officials (see Little Rock, whose board is controlled by the business community) would authorize a sales tax on hamburgers, groceries and everything else to subsidize commercial development, typically the likes of big sporting good stores and entertainment districts.

I bet some developers are waiting in the wings to seek this subsidy in Little Rock and that the chamber of ocmmerce-controlled board — which thinks free enterprise means free financing on the taxpayer tab — has lots of good ideas about taxing local people to benefit private interests. Sure they'll create some new waitressing and clerk jobs. But they'll also kill some at competitors elsewhere who don't enjoy such subsidies.

The amendment also makes it easier for local governments to borrow money and would allow taxes to shore up police and fire pension funds. Police and firefighters are the figleaf for another naked grab at corporate welfare, stymied by court rulings in the case of the Tax Increment Finance boondoggle, another real estate developer enrichment scheme.

Hold your breath: Looks like Teresa Oelke and the other running dogs at the Koch boys' Arkansas lobby and I are in agreement on this one. Haven't seen them doing any mailing on this one, however.

Oh, Jesus, I've just learned Debbie Pelley is against Issue 2 as well because it will supposedly fund UN projects. If Jerry Cox joins in, I may have to rethink.

Tags: , , ,


Favorite

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Little Rock school activists announce events for 60th anniversary of Central High crisis

    The group is not affiliated with the official "Reflections of Progress" commemoration of the 60th anniversary. However, at least two of the Little Rock Nine may be joining the group for an event at 2:30 p.m. at the state Capitol in the Old Supreme Court Chamber.
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • Trump tariffs hit farmers hard

    Well, the trade war has begun and the early returns for farmers are not good — sharp reductions in the prices for soybeans and corn. You may have heard that Arkansas, which overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump, has some agricultural interests, particularly in soybeans.
    • Jul 6, 2018
  • Arkansas legislature rejects bipartisan effort to study race relations

    On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council soundly rejected a bipartisan effort by two senators to to create a temporary legislative subcommittee to study race relations in the state.
    • Sep 15, 2017

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation