Are Republicans serious about Medicaid solution? | Arkansas Blog

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Are Republicans serious about Medicaid solution?

Posted By on Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:30 AM

Columnist John Brummett writes from behind the Arkansas Democrat Gazette's paywall today about an emerging sentiment among some state legislators to delay a decision on accepting federal Medicaid expansion until a special session.

Brummett endeavors to make the case for a well-considered, single-minded focus on this big question, particularly given some potential stumbling blocks worth consideration.

This is all well and good if more than three Republicans are really serious about solutions. I think, however, that the Republican Party health care strategy nationally (meaning, particularly, the Solid South of Dixieland) is delay, delay, delay. Through legal, political, interest group and filibuster pressure they plan to continue massive resistance to any movement toward the universal health care that is the birthright of other developed nations. The pretext of careful study is only the dressed-up language of the cultured segregationists of the 1960s. They cloaked their bigoted resistance to civil rights legislation in promises of giving the nigras a full seat at the table when the time was right and the federal gubmint was sufficiently well-versed on the peculiar needs of southern regions in implementation of the broad legislation. That time being never.

I'm particularly disappointed to see Brummett repeat the most spurious of Republican debate points — that the federal government may retreat in future years from the promise of 90 percent support of Medicaid. It might also retreat some year from providing postal service, highways and a national defense, but that is no reason to refuse to participate in the blessings of these programs today. Arkansas Republicans argue that Arkansas must stand up for tighter federal budgeting, even if it means cutting the throats of Arkansas people in need of health care. They'd have more moral ground if they'd stand up against federal spending in other areas. Why not reject financial support of the Arkansas National Guard, for example? Or refuse federal highway dollars?

I do believe there are a handful of Republicans who honestly believe full discussion and the manifest needs of hospitals and other Arkansas health care institutions might provide the context necessary to bring along a sufficient majority of rational lawmakers to the obvious conclusion: It would be good for Arkansas to expand Medicaid, both for the state budget and the state's people.

You see the lack I've identified, don't you, in the Tea Party contingent that dominates the new Republican majority?

"Rational lawmakers."

Brummett, by the way, continues to assert that Medicaid expansion is the "smart and right thing to do," but a few months delay won't matter.

Tags: ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Charter school accountability: Non-existent in Arkansas

    A state audit finds charter school spending violated state law, but the state Education Department says it has no responsibility for ensuring proper management of charter schools. Say what?
    • Mar 5, 2016
  • Policy group urges opposition to new charter seats in Little Rock

    The Arkansas Public Policy Panel is urging supporters of the Little Rock School District to tell state Board of Education members they oppose applications to be heard this week to dramatically expand the number of charter school seats in the Little Rock School District.
    • Mar 9, 2016
  • More on how highways were used to wipe out "blight" of non-white neighborhoods

    Vox, a news website that concerns itself with energy and other issues, has a fine piece, including before and after images, on the history of the U.S. interstate system and why roads were built through the middle of cities (unless people of influence stopped them — see Manhattan, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.)
    • Mar 22, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Monday. Again

    • Such a high level of discourse on the open line tonight. Every post would intimidate…

    • on October 17, 2017
  • Re: UA-Little Rock picks firm to study football

    • A feasibility study does not actually give a recommendation. It puts numbers on start up…

    • on October 17, 2017
  • Re: The Medicaid charade explained

    • DO YOU NEED AN URGENT LOAN, A LOAN TO START UP A NEW LINE OF…

    • on October 16, 2017

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation