Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Why Medicaid expansion makes sense

Posted By on Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:35 AM

medicaidgraf.jpg

Too bad John Brummett wrote his Wednesday Democrat-Gazette column behind the pay wall, where it will be read by only a few thousand on-line subscribers and the print subscribers who occasionally read further on-line.

It recapitulates Gov. Mike Beebe's explanation earlier this week of why Medicaid expansion makes sense. It will solve a shortfall in the current Medicaid program, primarily spent on nursing home care and health insurance for children. But that's not the driving reason to do it. The driving reason is that it will plug a coming health insurance gap for low-income working people, who fall in the neverland between private insurance and the coming insurance exchanges to be established under federal health legislation. We illustrated this enormous and punishing gap in our Big Picture feature a few weeks back. David Ramsey followed up the next week.

Beebe said, as has been said here repeatedly, that it makes no sense for ideologues in Arkansas to say the federal budget should be improved by poor Arkansas pushing to the front of the line to give up the relative pittance it will receive to benefit its working poor. That decision will hurt us, but won't contribute anything to the cause of reduced health care. Some of the care will be given by hospitals as indigent or no-pay care anyway. It will be built into the rates of paying customers, both at the hospital and in insurance. "Savings" for anyone are a mirage.

Writes Brummett:

For us to decline the expansion would be to close some of our hospitals, conspicuously deny insurance to our working poor people and perpetuate an unsustainable system of uncompensated care.

And it would accomplish diddly in regard to the federal deficit.

If you’re still opposed, then you’re simply stubborn or I need to go back and shorten some of these words and sentences.

It’s not a matter of ideology, which, in this case, only gets in the way of profound logic.

Logic? Republican majority? We'll soon see if those are mutually exclusive conditions.

Tags: , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • State Police issues statement on Jason Rapert 'threats'

    The State Police have issued a minor clarification in what appears to be an effort to soothe an enraged Sen. Jason Rapert, exposed here as overly excited about both a Conway parking lot question from a constituent as well as some inflammatory Internet rhetoric that he's interpreted as a dire threat on his life. State cops took his reports seriously, they say. But in the end, they found nothing actionable.
    • Sep 15, 2015
  • UPDATE: Judge rethinking punishment for attorneys in insurance settlement case

    Judge P.K. Holmes is rethinking whether lawyers deserve punishment in a class action lawsuit against an insurance company abruptly pulled from his court after pending more than a year and then quickly settled in a state court.
    • Jun 24, 2016
  • Transgender electrician may sue employer over her firing

    Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright has ruled that Patricia Dawson, a transgender woman, may pursue her lawsuit that she was wrongfully fired by her employer, H & H Electric, because of her sex.
    • Sep 16, 2015

Most Shared

  • Workers stiffed

    How is it going with the great experiment to make the Republican Party the champion of the sons and daughters of toil instead of the oligarchs of wealth and business?
  • O'Reilly's fall

    Whom the gods would destroy, they first make TV stars.

Visit Arkansas

Fishing the Diamond Lakes of Arkansas

Fishing the Diamond Lakes of Arkansas

Arkansas angler and fishing expert Billy Murray shares his extensive knowledge of the Diamond Lakes of Arkansas

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation