The ballad of Rapert | Arkansas Blog

Monday, February 4, 2013

The ballad of Rapert

Posted By on Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:16 AM

This Conway-grown musical commentary hasn't gone viral yet. But it's worth a click.

PS — It was reported earlier that Jason Rapert shut down his Facebook page after comments started pouring in about his Tea Party video, his unconstitutional bill to force transvaginal probes of women in the course of banning most abortion and his general Rapertude (anti-gay, anti-Muslim, birther, Koch agenda supporter, etc.) But Rapert allies are working to stifle dissent in other ways. A state employee who posted a remark critical of Rapert on another Facebook page was shocked to have his boss ask about it this morning. Turns out one of Rapert's henchmen had called after seeing the employee's name this morning. Free speech still lives in the U.S. of A, but state employees best be careful about the time and equipment they use to engage in it. Jason is watching.

PPS — UPDATE: As you already know, Rapert and defenders are basing his entire defense for a homophobic, nativist and inaccurate screed on various websites' criticism of him for making what sound like racially oriented remarks. He says the word "minorities" refers to political minorities. He is continuing that defense at the Capitol today and ignoring the rest of a repugnant address to a repugnant political group. Indeed, I'd urge all to watch the entire speech, provided here in four segments by a pro-Rapert website. As I've said before, it isn't pretty. David Ramsey of the Times also comments perceptively after a close review of the full speech:

Obviously close-reading the video is sort of a fool's errand (of course, we cannot know what is in Jason Rapert's heart). But...

If this has been pointed out yet, I haven't really seen it.

1) Rapert defenders are pointing to the mention of "minority interests" running roughshod at the beginning of the speech. That comment clearly refers to, in Rapert's view, the Arkansas Supreme Court overturning the popular will in Arkansas. But there are four total videos chronicling the speech, and from them we can see that it's about ten minutes between that mention and the notorious bit highlighted by the Nation. He completely drops the subject and talks about all kinds of other things (debt ceiling, bailouts, the holy spirit). He never again brings up judicial or political forces overturning the majority will. In fact, his only other mention of the courts is the opposite of a populist protest of judicial activism: a plea for the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the legislature (Obamacare). It strains credulity to suggest that the "minorities run roughshod" is a reference back to a point about the courts made ten minutes earlier.

2) What he was talking about immediately before the "minorities run roughshod" is a long spiel on taking the country back for the Lord, Obama, Ramadan, and Muslims. Even if we view this as charitably as possible and assume no racial element, it's clearly an attack on religious minorities. It sort of goes to show the tenuous place that American Muslims find themselves in that to really illustrate the point, you have to analogize: imagine the uproar if Rapert gave the same speech but said "Jews" and "Shabbat."

3) Rapert told a friendly blogger: "The majority of people in Arkansas oppose the policies of President Obama, including his health care law...Those Arkansans that support the President’s policies are in the minority, and in 2011 it was those minority political viewpoints that our leaders were using to govern hardworking Arkansas taxpayers who hold common sense conservative ideals." Leaving aside the Articles of Confederation style approach to democracy (does Massachusetts not have to follow policies of a Republican president?), this is disingenuous. The comment that has him in hot water came IMMEDIATELY after he said “We’re going to try to take this country back for the Lord. We’re going to try to take this country back for conservatism.” Emphasis mine. He's not talking about a minority political viewpoint within the confines of Arkansas. That's ridiculous.

Tags: , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (40)

Showing 1-40 of 40

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-40 of 40

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Sunday open line

    Open line and “news” on the Hog football coach.
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • The Clintons side by side in Little Rock 25 years after

    Bill and Hillary Clinton side by side taking questions from Donald Carville. The only thing more I could have asked for was a seat for Donald Trmp to handle the same topics.
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • Arkansas a leader in laws against better working conditions

    The Economic Policy Institute has compiled a national look at state laws that prevent local governments from mandating better working conditions in cities and counties than state law provides.As you might expect, Arkansas is among the leaders
    • Nov 19, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016
  • LR speakers blast state board for double standard

    A series of speakers, beginning with Sen. Joyce Elliott, denounced what they saw as a hidden agenda favoring charter schools at the state Department of Education and asked the state Board of Education for return of local control.
    • May 12, 2016
  • Kenneth Starr: A comment from Betsey Wright

    Betsey Wright, former President Bill Clinton's chief of staff when he was Arkansas governor, responds bitterly to a New York Times article today quoting Whitewater Prosecutor Kenneth Starr's warm words about Clinton. She can't forget the lives Starr ruined in Arkansas.
    • May 24, 2016

People who saved…

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation