Kaiser releases report on Medicaid and premium support | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Kaiser releases report on Medicaid and premium support

Posted By on Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:07 PM

The Kaiser Foundation released an overview this morning on Medicaid and premium assistance. Lots to digest if you're feeling wonky, but let's quickly highlight their findings that are relevant to the Arkansas "private option."

• Under the 1905(a) rule that Arkansas would use, all Medicaid provisions in terms of benefits and cost-sharing protections remain in place. This is extremely important and could be a sticking point with local Republican lawmakers, who have designs on asking for even more "flexibility." The only way out is a waiver, which doesn't seem likely. The Incidental Economist site had a good post yesterday on the possibility of HHS deciding they'd already gone too far and "walking back" from the "private option" offer if cost concerns grew too steep. But it's also possible that GOP lawmakers will walk away if they don't get all of their demands. Sen. David Sanders has told me repeatedly that they are "shooting for the moon." Hard to imagine that Republicans would screw over insurance companies and providers over a few details, but remember, these guys are true believers.

• One of the biggest challenges for past uses of premium assistance? A difficulty that is getting worse, not better? I bet you can guess! "One key challenge identified by state administrators is achieving cost effectiveness." (For various reasons, the Arkansas setup will be even more challenging, and depending on what you mean by comparable in cost, probably impossible.)

• About that comparability issue, the cost effectiveness test for other forms of premium assistance is likely unrealistic for the Arkansas "private option": "states must establish that the cost of covering an individual through premium assistance is the same or less than covering the individual in the direct Medicaid or CHIP program." Kaiser notes that the 1905(a) option "does not include a statutory reference to cost effectiveness, however recent regulatory guidance....includes a cost effectiveness definition similar to the statutory definition above." Uh oh!

• This is the big one and it's not going away. As framed by Kaiser, the "key question is whether the purchase of exchange coverage will prove cost effective since exchange coverage is expected to be more expensive than Medicaid."

Tags: , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (7)

Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

Readers also liked…

  • Auditor Lea caught not telling the truth

    State Auditor Andrea Lea, who began her tenure in statewide office with a degree of competence unseen in some other Republican counterparts (think Treasurer Dennis Milligan particularly), is becoming more deeply mired in a political scandal.
    • Mar 4, 2016
  • Sabin's subterfuge in the race for mayor has roots in rigged city government

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reports that an ethics complaint has been filed saying that the exploratory committee Rep. Warwick Sabin created to prepare for a run for Little Rock mayor was a subterfuge to avoid the city ordinance that doesn't allow campaign fundraising to begin until five months before the November 2018 election.Of course it is.
    • Aug 10, 2017
  • Another Republican miracle-working governor

    Great piece in Washington Post on the budget crisis in Louisiana. Big tax cuts and corporate welfare will do that to a state, particularly to a state whose previous governor, Republican Bobby Jindal, refused to join the Obamacare-funded Medicaid expansion. There's a lesson there for Arkansas.
    • Mar 4, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation