No Republican dare call it Medicaid expansion, but it is | Arkansas Blog

Monday, March 25, 2013

No Republican dare call it Medicaid expansion, but it is

Posted By on Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM

I quibbled with some Republican shills last night on Twitter about their bodacious spinning on the growing Republican support for taking federal Medicaid expansion dollars for Arkansas, but doing so through private insurance rather than a government-run program. Bottom line is the same: It will mean a huge increase in government spending on health care for the working poor. That's good. But I was just a bit rankled when a Republican convert to a plan wholly created by Obamacare sent out a Twitter last night again talking about the evils of Obamacare.

The Stateline news outfit has an instructive piece on the growing interest among previously dug-in Republicans about so-called "private option" Medicaid expansion. It addresses directly the semantic question.

Is it still Medicaid?

To beneficiaries and health care providers, the strategy that Arkansas and Ohio are pursuing would look exactly like private insurance. Instead of a Medicaid card, the newly eligible adults would get a private insurance card. They also would be responsible for certain co-pays, just like private insurance subscribers. The difference is that the state Medicaid program would pay their premiums with federal dollars.

The Medicaid agency would maintain control over enrollment and could determine that certain people in the expansion group, such as those with severe chronic illnesses, should receive traditional Medicaid benefits, including home health services and long-term care.

In fact, the private option already is allowed under the federal Medicaid law, although it is rarely used. Called “premium assistance,” it is considered cumbersome by Medicaid officials because it requires the agency to find a policy with roughly the same set of benefits that Medicaid offers—or provide additional benefits separately—and it must cost enrollees no more in copays than other Medicaid subscribers pay. If it does, Medicaid must reimburse the beneficiary.

But using the premium assistance option should be less of an administrative burden in 2014, when the federal health law takes effect. That’s because insurance companies should be eager to create plans that fit the state’s existing Medicaid benefits, because it will give them the opportunity to sell policies to hundreds of thousands of newly eligible beneficiaries.

Quacks like Medicaid to me. If it makes Republicans happy to call it something else — and gets Obamacare done — fine. But, as with Michael Cook's earlier on the cell phone tax increase, the hypocrisy is a little galling. An honest Republican would admit Obamacare was too good a deal to pass up and so they've decided to go along with implementation, but under a plan that he or she thinks is superior on grounds of benefit and efficiency. (For now, it seems likely to be less efficient and thus marginally more costly, but the real experience will ultimately decide that and possible changes in the future.)

PS — Note, too, that House Republican Leader Bruce Westerman is calling again for (AP) (and Gov. Beebe is rejecting) a special session to deal with Medicaid. More time to answer questions, see. More delay. Delay is defeat. Despite the growing warmth of Republicans toward an insurance industry-fattening "private option" approach, it seems clear some resistance in the ranks remains.

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • LR speakers blast state board for double standard

    A series of speakers, beginning with Sen. Joyce Elliott, denounced what they saw as a hidden agenda favoring charter schools at the state Department of Education and asked the state Board of Education for return of local control.
    • May 12, 2016
  • City Board votes to table homeless feeding ordinance for 8 weeks, study with commission

    The Little Rock Board of Directors voted tonight to table for eight weeks an ordinance that homeless advocates say would severely limit the ability of charities to feed homeless people in city parks. Before the ordinance was punted, Vice Mayor Kathy Webb proposed a nine-member commission to study the issue and make recommendations to the board.
    • May 16, 2017
  • Medical marijuana backers: Health Department opposition 'disingenuous' and 'cruel'

    Arkansans for Compassionate Care, the group behind the first medical marijuana initiative to qualify for the ballot, has responded sharply to yesterday's statement by the Arkansas Health Department that it opposes legal medical use of marijuana.
    • Jul 13, 2016

Most Shared

  • Conflicts of interest in the legislatures

    The Center for Public Integrity and the Associated Press collaborated for a project aimed at highlighting state legislators whose lawmaking might be affected by private business interests.
  • Industrial hemp pilot program coming soon to Arkansas

    One of the booths at this week's Ark-La-Tex Medical Cannabis Expo was hosted by the Arkansas Hemp Association, a trade group founded to promote and expand non-intoxicating industrial hemp as an agricultural crop in the state. AHA Vice President Jeremy Fisher said the first licenses to grow experimental plots of hemp in the state should be issued by the Arkansas State Plant Board next spring.
  • Cats and dogs

    I've always been leery of people who dislike animals. To my wife and me, a house without dog hair in the corners and a cat perched on the windowsill is as barren as a highway rest stop. We're down to three dogs and two cats, the smallest menagerie we've had for years.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation