Tom Cotton says president is "court packing" | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Tom Cotton says president is "court packing"

Posted By on Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:59 AM

Tom Cotton image
  • Tom Cotton: serving up the red meat half-baked

I'll say this for Rep. Tom Cotton: he knows his audience. If there is a nonsensical argument to make against President Obama, Cotton will leap to the head of the line. This week's entry is the hilariously titled "Stop Court Packing Act," introduced by Cotton with no co-sponsors in response to Obama nominating three judges to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Cotton proposes to instead eliminate the three positions Obama is attempting to fill.

Here's the source of the controversy: The president is constitutionally charged with nominating judges to fill vacancies on the federal bench, and there are three vacancies on the D.C. Circuit. But Senate Republicans have aggressively used the threat of a filibuster to block judicial nominees from ever getting to the Senate floor for a confirmation vote. So lots of seats remain vacant. It's a big problem, as Supreme Court Justice John Roberts has pointed out to the Senate Judiciary committee (Roberts says the D.C. Circuit should have its full roster of 11 judges — these three seats have been vacant since Obama's first term).

Because of its location, the D.C. Circuit has an outsized impact on policy. Republicans don't want any Obama nominees to join the court, which is currently made up of a majority of Republican nominees. As Matthew Yglesias at Slate put it, "The controversy is over whether the judicial nominees of a duly elected president of the United States should receive confirmation votes on the floor of the U.S. Senate or if instead there should be a rule that vacancies can only be filled by Republican Party presidents."

Ludicrously, Cotton and some Senate Republicans are saying that Obama is "packing" the court by attempting to fill vacancies (should we bother to note that Bush nominations were not considered court packing?). The term is a reference to FDR's infamous attempt to add seats to the U.S. Supreme Court so that he could nominate judges that would support his agenda. Cotton said that Obama's "nominations today to the D.C. Circuit are an obvious effort to pack a court that has frustrated his liberal, big-government ambitions." Obama pointed out that, no, court packing "involved Franklin Delano Roosevelt trying to add additional seats to the Supreme Court in order to water down and get more support for his political agenda. We’re not adding seats here. We’re trying to fill seats that are already existing."

In fact, changing the number of judges on a court in order to influence its ideological makeup — as Cotton proposes to do — is itself the kind of gross power grab that made FDR's attempted stunt so shocking. Cotton is proposing court packing in reverse.

Of course, none of this matters. Red meat is best served half-baked, and Cotton isn't really trying to advance a logical argument. Any fight he can pick with Obama is good for Cotton, who will be announcing his candidacy for Senate against Mark Pryor any day now. As University of Arkansas politics professor Janine Parry told Stephens Media, “This kind of thing is a way to earn the kind of stripes that guarantee a big investment in him by the Republican Party and its allies."

p.s. Senate Democrats share the blame for this mess via their failure to reform the filibuster, and though Republicans have taken the practice to epic heights during the Obama administration, Dems have been guilty of filibuster shenanigans in the past. I propose "powardice" as a made-up word for Senate Democrats, whose fetish for institutional power and cowardly political instincts have protected the filibuster.

Tags: , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (33)

Showing 1-33 of 33

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-33 of 33

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

Readers also liked…

  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • More on how highways were used to wipe out "blight" of non-white neighborhoods

    Vox, a news website that concerns itself with energy and other issues, has a fine piece, including before and after images, on the history of the U.S. interstate system and why roads were built through the middle of cities (unless people of influence stopped them — see Manhattan, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.)
    • Mar 22, 2016
  • The long and winding road: No exception yet for 30 Crossing

    The Arkansas highway department's representative on the Metroplan board of directors told the board today that the department is requesting an exception to the planning agency's cap on six lanes for its 30 Crossing project to widen Interstate 30 from six to 10 (and more) lanes.
    • Jun 29, 2016

People who saved…

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation