Competition, the private option, and an under-the-radar policy decision | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Competition, the private option, and an under-the-radar policy decision

Posted By on Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:22 PM

My talking head chats with Roby Brock about the "private option" and carrier competition on the Arkansas Health Insurance Marketplace (HIM). One issue we touch on is the dominance of Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield, which controls more than 75 percent of the market today. While having five carriers on the HIM should make for a relatively competitive market, it's unclear whether or not the HIM will help other carriers make a dent in that market-share domination. One big question is whether the "private option" consumers on the HIM — who won't be paying attention to price since the government will be paying for their premiums — will flock to Blue Cross because of brand-name recognition.

Roby points out that while companies won't be competing on price for that pool of consumers, they'll compete in other ways. Consumers can comparison shop between different benefit packages and find the one they like best. The HIM is a regulated marketplace and there are minimum standards of coverage that all plans have to offer, but it's still a fair point that customers will be potentially be looking at more than just a plan's brand name. The trouble is, if plans are competing to offer the best benefits to customers who don't care what a plan costs, that doesn't bode well for keeping premium prices low! Austin Frakt at the Incidental Economist touched on this issue back when the "private option" policy framework first emerged and ignited discussion of how much this approach would cost compared to traditional Medicaid expansion.

The vast majority, about 80-85%, of insurers’ spending is on medical care. The customary ways to substantially reduce costs is to lower payment rates to providers or reduce the volume of care insured. Either one of these reduces policyholders’ access to care. This, in large part, is why Medicaid is so cheap. Of course, policyholders won’t like this. Nobody likes to be told, “No.” The way they are compensated for less in the market is through lower prices. People are willing to get less if they pay less. Sometimes they prefer it, since they have other uses for their money.

But wait, who’s paying the bills here? It’s not individuals, mostly. It’s the government. ...There is very little motivation by consumers to willingly trade less generous coverage for lower cost. Under such conditions, competition can’t drive costs down very far. Consumers won’t stand for it when they’re paying with someone else’s money. A plan that tries to go too far will likely lose market share and experience reduced profit. This is not a set-up in which I would expect private plans in competition to beat Medicaid on price. (It doesn’t happen in Medicare Part D either. As beneficial as competition has been in that market, it has not brought prices down to the level paid by Medicaid or the VA.)

I meant to mention in the interview that there was a plan to build in a competitive effect for the expansion pool, but a quiet policy decision from the Beebe administration nixed it, at least in Year One. The idea was to create "competitive bidding" rules — the government would only pick up the premiums for "private option" consumers for, say, the two cheapest plans. That would mean less choice for those consumers, but a very strong incentive for companies to compete for access to the 200,000 low-income Arkansans in the "private option" pool.

As DHS Director John Selig explained to me, policymakers decided against competitive bidding in the first year because they wanted to focus on bringing in carriers and building a strong market. That's a fair argument, but it's a decision that leaves some big questions about competition, which was one of the major selling points about the "private option." Either way, it was a major policy choice that was made under the radar — in a long day of testimony on the "private option" before the Public Health committee last month, competitive bidding never came up.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

  • Authorities investigate accusation against Dean Elliott

    An accusation has been lodged against Dean Elliott, the Dillard's lobbyist and former state representative who is running for the District 15 seat in the state Senate, by a woman who claims that he was involved in a 2016 hit and run incident on Tennyson Drive in Conway that left her with severe injuries. Through a lawyer, Elliott says the allegation is false and politically motivated.
    • May 17, 2018
  • Rep. Jana Della Rosa disputes that Randell Shelton's Paradigm Consulting was a "bogus company"

    During the trial of former state Sen. Jon Woods and consultant Randell Shelton, the prosecution described Shelton's Paradigm Strategic Consulting as a "bogus company." But Rep. Jana Della Rosa, who paid Paradigm in 2014 for help with campaign messaging, said that Shelton did legitimate work for her.
    • May 16, 2018
  • A senator's vanity

    Spotted in Little Rock...
    • May 16, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • A response to police arrests becomes a tutorial on race, class and policing in Little Rock

    John Walker, the 79-year-old civil rights lawyer, and his associate, Omavi Shukur, 29, a young lawyer devoted to criminal justice reform, talked to press this afternoon about their arrests Monday by Little Rock police for supposedly obstructing governmental operations in observing and attempting to film a routine police traffic stop. It was a tutorial on sharp views of race, class and governance in Little Rock.
    • Sep 29, 2016
  • Latest Obamacare repeal bill would hit Arkansas treasury hard

    The latest effort to undo Obamacare, the Graham-Cassidy legislation, would shift federal support for health coverage to a block grant system to the states. Bad news for Arkansas.
    • Sep 18, 2017
  • Donald Trump declares war on Hillary Clinton's marriage

    Donald Trump gave a remarkable interview to the New York Times yesterday in which he declared open season on the marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton's past infidelity. Seems like a loser, but I've been wrong before.
    • Oct 1, 2016

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: An open line, plus an endorsement

    • I don't know if any of you are fans of the show "Madame Secretary", but…

    • on May 20, 2018
  • Re: An open line, plus an endorsement

    • You're right Olphart. It has been about a month since we've heard anything from Doigotta…

    • on May 20, 2018
  • Re: An open line, plus an endorsement

    • Has Doigotta embarked on an around the world tour, too? Haven't heard from her lately…

    • on May 20, 2018



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation