Republicans have already won a budget compromise; big one | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Republicans have already won a budget compromise; big one

Posted By on Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:23 PM

click to enlarge chartbudget.png

Democrats don't compromise? The chart above gives the answer graphically. Wonkblog explains:

One thing that's gotten lost in the debate over the shutdown is how much Democrats have already conceded to Republicans on spending. This is partly the consequence of the direct spending cuts in the 2011 debt-ceiling deal and partly the consequence of sequestration (which was, of course, also part of the 2011 deal). Still, the bottom line is that Republicans have been so successful at making Obamacare concessions the issue that Democratic concessions on spending have gone almost unnoticed.

Again. To Republicans, compromise means: 1) We get everything we want; 2) You shut up.

The bodacious liar Too Extreme Tom Cotton kept at it today with this amazingly dishonest statement:

Regrettably, the government has shut down because of the stubborn, party-line votes of the Senate Democrats. The House Republicans have acted reasonably and responsibly to act on simple principles: the government should be funded and the American people should get relief from Obamacare.

We have repeatedly made reasonable and responsible compromises. We couldn’t repeal Obamacare, so we offered to defund it. We offered to delay it for one year when the President has delayed so many parts of it himself. Yet the Senate rejected every one of those compromises.

And now, we have simply said if Obamacare is such an amazing success story then Members of Congress and Senators and their staffers should live under the laws they impose on the American people. But that’s not enough for Senate Democrats. They would rather keep their special exemption from Obamacare then keep the government open.

So when I am asked when the government will reopen, the answer is very simple; when the United States Senate puts national interests ahead of their personal, financial interests.”

It begins with a simple, undemocratic principle: Congress should not fund a law of the United States that one branch of Congress doesn't like. It rolls downhill from there.

But sure. Take away insurance from members of Congress who oppose Obamacare. That seems only fair

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016
  • Little Rock school activists announce events for 60th anniversary of Central High crisis

    The group is not affiliated with the official "Reflections of Progress" commemoration of the 60th anniversary. However, at least two of the Little Rock Nine may be joining the group for an event at 2:30 p.m. at the state Capitol in the Old Supreme Court Chamber.
    • Sep 14, 2017
  • Medical marijuana backers: Health Department opposition 'disingenuous' and 'cruel'

    Arkansans for Compassionate Care, the group behind the first medical marijuana initiative to qualify for the ballot, has responded sharply to yesterday's statement by the Arkansas Health Department that it opposes legal medical use of marijuana.
    • Jul 13, 2016

Most Shared

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation