Speaking of science: what's next for the Little Rock Technology Park | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Speaking of science: what's next for the Little Rock Technology Park

Posted By on Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:10 PM

click to enlarge lrgtechpark.png

Further thoughts on Leslie Peacock's report last night on the Little Rock Technology Park Authority's struggle to get off the ground more than two years after city voters approved a sales tax increase that is supposed to contribute $22 million to the effort.

UALR Chancellor Joel Anderson presented the most coherent, practical and sound presentation yet on what the park should be and where it should be. UALR has much of the ground already in hand. It would dislocate, at some long future time, two to nine unwilling homeowners. Even then, the land has long been targeted for university expansion. He proposes to pay even renters to relocate. In the short run, there'd be no residential disruptions. It would be not only close but adjoining UALR and not far from UAMS. Anderson proposes, as the state law that created the authority anticipates, university laboratories. He dismisses the idea of use of vacant buildings downtown as incubators for tech businesses as contrary to the intended focus of applied science research.

Anderson is serious, thorough, sane, rational and thoughtful. Too bad all those elements weren't present in the build-it-and-somebody-will-come thinking that inaugurated this project, misconceived when it wasn't poorly conceived at the outset.

I confess to finding allure in the sexier idea of plugging holes downtown with tech entrepreneurs drawn to a burgeoning urban lifestyle as well as business development. Like or hate either vision, though, it says a lot about the incoherence of this project that it requires, at this late date, some sound schooling from Chancellor Anderson on what the law is supposed to be about.

And as praiseworthy as Anderson's work has been, I'd be remiss if I didn't raise this question:

Is the city of Little Rock really going to get in the business of underwriting applied science laboratories at a state university? Isn't that the state's responsibility?

It is a slippery and steep slope for the city to edge down.

It comes with practical concerns, which Anderson acknowledged. He doesn't want to own this building. And who can blame him? It will require a grounds crew, a janitorial crew, utilities, management. Who's going to pay for that? Rent will account for some of that. Can UALR and UAMS afford to rent space? At least one person remarked last night on the hope for rent-free space. Really? Rent-free? Is the city going to have to pay to operate the building? And about that $22 million. It's not now available in a lump sum, but is supposed to accumulate over 10 years. But there was talk of building a 150,000-square-foot building that would open debt-free? How? Isn't that $15 million or so?

If I'd trust anybody in what has been, until Joel Anderson's bracing emergence in recent weeks, a sorry spectacle of wishful thinking, petty bickering and leadership vacuum, it is Joel Anderson. But it's still worth some reflection on the muddled city thinking that got us here and the need for better thinking than shown earlier on where we're going.

Tags: ,


Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Rapert will introduce anti-abortion 'trigger' law, despite public opinion to the contrary

    Sen. Jason Rapert has announced on Facebook his plans to file this week a so-called trigger law — like those passed in four other states — that would make abortion illegal in Arkansas immediately if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade. Polling suggests the majority would oppose it.
    • Jan 21, 2019
  • A cautionary casino tale from Tunica, Miss.

    The Los Angeles Times reports on the sagging casino economy in Tunica, Miss., a sag due in part to increasing national competition.
    • Jan 21, 2019
  • Fact check: The annual anti-abortion march

    The annual abortion protest marches were held around the country Sunday and, as usual, press accounts duly quoted the misinformation repeated there. From the coverage of the Arkansas march, this stood out:
    • Jan 21, 2019
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Is Arkansas in or out on Kobach voter data effort?

    The Washington Post has published a map that counts Arkansas as among states that will "partially comply" with a sweeping request for voter data by the so-called election integrity commission set up by Donald Trump in an effort to cast doubt on Hillary Clinton's 3 million-vote popular defeat of him in 2016.
    • Jul 2, 2017
  • Greenbrier's paddling of student protester goes worldwide

    The paddling of Greenbrier High School students who joined in te national school walkout Wednesday has produced headlines worldwide.
    • Mar 17, 2018
  • Rep. Mary Bentley's website now supports gay rights

    Somebody has cybersquatted on Republican Rep. Mary Bentley's website, replacing her messaging with a call for equal rights for LGBTQ people.
    • Jul 18, 2017


Most Recent Comments


© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation