Speaking of science: what's next for the Little Rock Technology Park | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Speaking of science: what's next for the Little Rock Technology Park

Posted By on Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:10 PM

click to enlarge lrgtechpark.png

Further thoughts on Leslie Peacock's report last night on the Little Rock Technology Park Authority's struggle to get off the ground more than two years after city voters approved a sales tax increase that is supposed to contribute $22 million to the effort.

UALR Chancellor Joel Anderson presented the most coherent, practical and sound presentation yet on what the park should be and where it should be. UALR has much of the ground already in hand. It would dislocate, at some long future time, two to nine unwilling homeowners. Even then, the land has long been targeted for university expansion. He proposes to pay even renters to relocate. In the short run, there'd be no residential disruptions. It would be not only close but adjoining UALR and not far from UAMS. Anderson proposes, as the state law that created the authority anticipates, university laboratories. He dismisses the idea of use of vacant buildings downtown as incubators for tech businesses as contrary to the intended focus of applied science research.

Anderson is serious, thorough, sane, rational and thoughtful. Too bad all those elements weren't present in the build-it-and-somebody-will-come thinking that inaugurated this project, misconceived when it wasn't poorly conceived at the outset.

I confess to finding allure in the sexier idea of plugging holes downtown with tech entrepreneurs drawn to a burgeoning urban lifestyle as well as business development. Like or hate either vision, though, it says a lot about the incoherence of this project that it requires, at this late date, some sound schooling from Chancellor Anderson on what the law is supposed to be about.

And as praiseworthy as Anderson's work has been, I'd be remiss if I didn't raise this question:

Is the city of Little Rock really going to get in the business of underwriting applied science laboratories at a state university? Isn't that the state's responsibility?

It is a slippery and steep slope for the city to edge down.

It comes with practical concerns, which Anderson acknowledged. He doesn't want to own this building. And who can blame him? It will require a grounds crew, a janitorial crew, utilities, management. Who's going to pay for that? Rent will account for some of that. Can UALR and UAMS afford to rent space? At least one person remarked last night on the hope for rent-free space. Really? Rent-free? Is the city going to have to pay to operate the building? And about that $22 million. It's not now available in a lump sum, but is supposed to accumulate over 10 years. But there was talk of building a 150,000-square-foot building that would open debt-free? How? Isn't that $15 million or so?

If I'd trust anybody in what has been, until Joel Anderson's bracing emergence in recent weeks, a sorry spectacle of wishful thinking, petty bickering and leadership vacuum, it is Joel Anderson. But it's still worth some reflection on the muddled city thinking that got us here and the need for better thinking than shown earlier on where we're going.

Tags: ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • Two plead in fraud of sheriff's office

    A former employee of the Pulaski County sheriff and a North Little Rock woman who sold goods to the sheriff's office have pleaded guilty to mail fraud in a scheme to steal from the sheriff's office, according to a news release from the U.S. attorney's office.
    • May 16, 2017
  • LR speakers blast state board for double standard

    A series of speakers, beginning with Sen. Joyce Elliott, denounced what they saw as a hidden agenda favoring charter schools at the state Department of Education and asked the state Board of Education for return of local control.
    • May 12, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation