Arkansas Republican Party correct on Beebe lawsuit | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Arkansas Republican Party correct on Beebe lawsuit

Posted By on Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:51 AM

Max here, with a brief check-in from a ship steaming toward Jamaica. My quick perusal of the Arkansas Blog this morning brought an occasion to agree wholeheartedly with the Arkansas Republican Party and I didn't want to let the opportunity for harmony pass.

The GOP yesterday sued Gov. Mike Beebe under the Freedom of Information Act to review applications for state appointments. The governor will fight the lawsuit.

I've argued tirelessly, tiresomely and fruitlessly for years that every governor since I arrived in Arkansas in 1973 has used an overbroad interpretation of the FOI's exemption for "working papers" of the governor. In short, the governors have said everything in their office is protected by that dome of secrecy.

The issue hasn't been fully litigated. It needs to be. In some states, the statutes make clear definitions of what constitutes a working paper of the governor. It is a term of law and broad categories of infiormation are open to inspection. Certainly, a governor's private thoughts and advice from staffers on sensitive matters might be due some consideration. But, too often, governors have taken information in from other state agencies and the public — information that was clearly public in nature — and made it secret in the sheltering arms of the governor's office.

One of the worst offenders, you might remember, was Republican Gov. Mike Huckabee. He carried it to absurd extremes in fighting release of information about everything from clemency decisions to hard drive destruction to handling of his appointees who ran into trouble on the job. (An example of the last brought a successful FOI action that unearthed some racy e-mail in a Huckabee appointee's account.)

Anyway, let the suit proceed. All the way to the Arkansas Supreme Court. And let's hope for some precedent-setting sunshine. Because you may be sure that if a Republican succeeds Beebe, the necessity for gubernatorial secrecy in appointment deliberations — and everything else — will suddenly seem worth a second thought.

Back to the boat drinks.

PS — Maybe what's needed here is a friend-of-the-court intervention to ensure that the full measure of this issue is litigated, not just a targeted GOP jab.


From the ArkTimes store


Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • LR speakers blast state board for double standard

    A series of speakers, beginning with Sen. Joyce Elliott, denounced what they saw as a hidden agenda favoring charter schools at the state Department of Education and asked the state Board of Education for return of local control.
    • May 12, 2016
  • Trump's strangulation of Obamacare

    If he can't kill it outright, Donald Trump will do all he can to cripple Obamacare. Vox has detailed reporting on deep cuts in federal spending that support nonprofit agencies that help people sign up for coverage under the Affordable Care Act.
    • Sep 18, 2017
  • Satanic Temple: Make Rapert pay for Ten Commandments monument

    A petition drive has begun to encourage a demand that Sen. Jason Rapert pay for the legal fees in defending his Ten Commandments monument proposed for the state Capitol grounds. It's more work by the Satanic Temple, which has fought church-state entanglement around the country.
    • Aug 28, 2016

Most Shared

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation