At least Bart Hester is honest about his opposition to the private option | Arkansas Blog

Monday, January 20, 2014

At least Bart Hester is honest about his opposition to the private option

Posted By on Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:35 PM

HESTER: His low-income constituents eligible for the private option chose their lot in life, he says, so the government shouldn't help them.
  • HESTER: His low-income constituents eligible for the private option chose their lot in life, he says, so the government shouldn't help them.
I wanted to quickly revisit Max's note this morning on Sen. Bart Hester, and his email exchange with a constituent whose father has coverage under the private option, coverage he would lose if Hester and his allies are successful in blocking the appropriation. Hester was unsympathetic. Read the whole exchange here.

This bit is worth highlighting: 

By working poor you mean a family of 4 making $94,000 per year. That's is [sic] the definition of working poor according by PO and ACA.

If you are unemployed in dist1 in AR and you are an able bodied adult then I 100% say it is by your choice.  
Now, we should note that Hester is conflating two different things (a common approach for private option opponents), and the private option actually only covers people below 138 percent of the federal poverty level, which is around $32,500 for a family of four (or a little less than $16,000 a year for an individual).

But that aside I think Hester's comments here are helpful in contrast to the misleading claims we fisked in Rep. Joe Farrer's Talk Business piece on the private option, which was indicative of the hodge-podge of see-what-sticks, semi-coherent arguments against expanding health coverage we've seen from private option opponents over the past several months. 

Hester is blunt, and perfectly coherent. He doesn't want the government helping folks who are out of work with healthcare. People in his district who don't have a job, he writes, 100 percent chose to be unemployed. Of course, many people who qualify for the private option do work, but Hester doesn't think they should get help with their healthcare either. 

If you believe that poor people are poor by choice, it follows that you might not like the idea of social safety-net programs for the poor. If poverty is a lifestyle choice, lack of healthcare is just part of the lifestyle. 

Opponents of the private option are rarely so direct about their reasoning. 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (26)

Showing 1-26 of 26

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-26 of 26

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

  • DHS continues to reimburse Medicaid managed care company co-owned by Preferred Family Healthcare

    The Department of Human Services continues to use a provider-led Medicaid managed care company that is part-owned by Preferred Family Healthcare, despite a recent decision to cut other ties with the Springfield, Mo.-based nonprofit enmeshed in multiple corruption scandals.
    • Jul 13, 2018
  • State yanks PFH funds

    Another former executive with scandal-plagued mental health provider arrested.
    • Jul 5, 2018
  • Robin Raveendran and Person 9 in the Cranford/Preferred Family Healthcare web

    The federal criminal information released as part of former lobbyist Rusty Cranford's June 7 guilty plea on bribery charges describes a Person 9 who worked for the nonprofit healthcare provider Preferred Family Healthcare and was associated with Cranford. The description of Person 9 appears to match Robin Raveendran, the former PFH executive — and former longtime staffer at the state's Department of Human Services — who was arrested Thursday in a separate case, charged in Independence County with two felony counts of Medicaid fraud after an investigation by the state's Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.
    • Jun 29, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

People who saved…

Most Viewed

  • Lawsuit seeks halt of Interstate 630 widening work, sees link to 30 Crossing project

    A federal lawsuit was filed today to halt work on an expansion of Interstate 630 between Baptist Medical Center and University Avenue because the Arkansas Department of Transportation didn't perform an environmental assessment of the work. UPDATE: The state refused service of the lawsuit, an unusual happenstance that a federal judge might hear about Thursday.

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation