Federal challenge of Arkansas same-sex marriage ban amended to reflect developments | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Federal challenge of Arkansas same-sex marriage ban amended to reflect developments

Posted By on Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM

TURNED DOWN: Pam and Rita Jernigan, at county clerk's office when they failed to obtain a marriage license,  were married in Iowa and are now seeking injunctions against state officials against discriminatory state law. - BRIAN CHILSON
  • Brian Chilson
  • TURNED DOWN: Pam and Rita Jernigan, at county clerk's office when they failed to obtain a marriage license, were married in Iowa and are now seeking injunctions against state officials against discriminatory state law.

Plaintiffs in a federal court lawsuit challenging the state's statutory and constitutional prohibitions on same-sex marriage have filed an amended version of the lawsuit.

Among other changes, the lawsuit adds references to a number of decisions in federal courts in other states invalidating state laws discriminating against same-sex couples, either by prohibiting marriage or not granting recognition to legal marriages in other states. It seeks a preliminary injunction.

Said the lawsuit, in an amended complaint filed Friday:

Arkansas cannot justify its exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage  and marriage recognition under any standard of constitutional scrutiny. 

As other lawsuits have done, the Arkansas challenge notes Justice Antonin Scalia's own analysis, in opposing a decision favoring recognition for a legally married woman under federal tax law, that the decision could lead inevitably to the broader rulings.

Among other arguments, the suit says:

Government interference with fundamental liberty interests triggers strict scrutiny. As such, Arkansas’s denial of state-recognized marriage to same-sex couples and its refusal to recognize same-sex marriages entered into in other jurisdictions may be upheld only upon a showing that the restrictions are narrowly tailored to advance a  compelling government interest. Defendants cannot meet this requirement. The challenged laws are not even rationally related to the furtherance of a legitimate government interest. Therefore, the laws are facially unconstitutional and as applied to the Plaintiffs. 

The suit details benefits and privileges allowed only to married couples, including workers comp and insurance and retirement benefits. It said: "Laws that refuse to recognize the marriages of same-sex couples validly
entered into in other jurisdictions are facially unconstitutional and as applied to Plaintiffs  because they categorically deprive Plaintiffs of rights based on their sexual orientation. "

The amended complaint specifically seeks injunctions in behalf of plaintiffs Rita and Pam Jernigan against Richard Weiss, director of the state Department of Finance and Administration, and George Hopkins, director of the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System. DFA won't allow the couple, legally married in Iowa, to file a joint tax return. The retirement system won't extend spousal benefits to Pam Jernigan under Rita Jernigan's retirement plan because she may not be considered a spouse under Arkansas law. The suit said:

Numerous similarly-situated same-sex couples in the state who have entered into valid marriages in states that recognize same-sex marriage are deprived of  the benefits that DFA and ATRS provide to married opposite-sex couples. No public  interest exists in continued discrimination that lacks a legitimate purpose and targets a certain class of people for unlawful discrimination based on sexual preference.

The suit seeks declaratory judgments that Arkansas Constitution and laws violate the federal constitution and for injunctive relief. Jack Wagoner, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said he hoped to have a hearing quickly on the request for a preliminary injunction. Judge Kristin Baker is handling the case.


Tags: , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Driver killed in crash with Maumelle officer

    Maumelle police report the death early this morning of a motorist who crashed head-on with a Maumelle police officer. The officer and two passengers in the other vehicle were injured.
    • Sep 23, 2017
  • Walmart lawyer picked for U.S. attorney in western Arkansas

    Donald Trump has nominated Duane "Dak" Kees,  director of global ethics and compliance at Walmart Stores, to be U.S. attorney for the western district of Arkansas. It has been filled on an interim basis by a career lawyer in the office.
    • Sep 22, 2017
  • Another way to mark the 60th school crisis anniversary

    There are two separate observances this weekend of the 60th anniversary of the Little Rock school progress. One emphasizes "progress." One talks about how far we still have to go.
    • Sep 22, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • ASU to reap $3.69 million from estate of Jim and Wanda Lee Vaughn

    Arkansas State University announced today plans for spending an expected $3.69 million gift in the final distribution of the estate of Jim and Wanda Lee Vaughn, who died in 2013 and 2015 respectively.
  • Bad health care bill, again

    Wait! Postpone tax reform and everything else for a while longer because the Senate is going to try to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act one more time before September ends and while it can do it with the votes of only 50 senators.
  • Sex on campus

    Look, the Great Campus Rape Crisis was mainly hype all along. What Vice President Joe Biden described as an epidemic of sexual violence sweeping American college campuses in 2011 was vastly overstated.
  • The inadequate legacy of Brown

    LRSD continues to abdicate its responsibility to educate poor black students.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation