Searching for two more votes for a private option supermajority | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Searching for two more votes for a private option supermajority

Posted By on Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:18 AM

CARTER: "game-time decision" whether House will vote on private option this afternoon
  • CARTER: "game-time decision" whether House will vote on private option this afternoon

Will the House vote this afternoon on the Department of Human Services appropriation which includes the private option? It’s a “game time decision,” according to House leadership.

Last week, House Speaker Davy Carter committed to a strategy of voting every single day, but it sounds like they’ve reconsidered that approach for this week – a vote will presumably only be held today if they’re confident they have 75. So far, 73 have voted yes, leaving them two votes short of the needed supermajority. Carter also announced this week that the fiscal session will end March 6, leaving lawmakers just over a week before facing the prospect of leaving the session without a budget for the entire Medicaid program. 

A number of private option proponents on both sides of the aisle have been critical of Carter’s approach and occasionally heated rhetoric. They question why a vote was taken on Wednesday and Thursday of last week when it was known they were short of 75 and that a handful of votes were promising they would vote yes a day or two later. Critics suggest that the last handful of votes — including lawmakers who were saying they would eventually vote yes — could have been picked up through quiet engagement and without the need for four consecutive failed votes. Carter, however, points out that they steadily picked up votes throughout the week and believes that the daily votes were necessary to solidify their count. For all of the promises, not all of the "yes, but wait" votes have materialized — there was a "Lucy pulling the football from Charlie Brown" feeling to last week. From Carter's perspective, perhaps anything less than forcing the issue every day would have only dragged out the gamesmanship. That said, necessary or not, there were certainly some possible downsides to last week's approach: frustration among some lawmakers having to make a tough yes vote multiple times and the perception from multiple failed votes that the votes simply aren't there, lending at least a talking point to the defund bitter-enders. 

Of course, all of this Monday-morning quarterbacking will be a footnote if the private option passes the House in the next two weeks. It appears likely that there will only be one more vote this session — either on the day when 75 votes are in place, or on the final day of the session, when the threat of leaving without a budget will be immediate. Here's the strange dynamic at the Capitol right now: Not only proponents, but most of the no votes, believe that the private option will pass — but nobody knows quite how those last two votes will materialize. Two no votes have even been telling constituents and stakeholders that they won't vote for the private option, but "don't worry, it will pass." 

Another key dynamic: many Republicans, including opponents of the private option, believe that a minority of lawmakers blocking the entire Medicaid budget over a demand to end the private option (and kick 100,000 Arkansans off of coverage) would be a political disaster for the Republican party, with implications for the 2014 statewide races for governor and senator, and control of the House. There is a subset of no votes that privately are hoping the private option will pass for this reason, but don't want to be the ones to take the political heat. 

Many lawmakers believe that the standoff in the House at this point is rooted in the fact that around four or five legislators currently voting no made assurances to Bell and private option proponents that they would vote for the private option if his amendment banning outreach was added. The Bell amendment thus far has picked up only Bell, along with the implicit support of Americans for Prosperity. The Bell amendment itself was reportedly added only after long negotiations in which lawmakers in Bell's camp made commitments of support on which they have not thus far followed through — if that’s true, it helps explain why Carter has ruled out negotiating further.

That is one possible way out this week: a group of lawmakers in the Bell group might collectively flip and make essentially the same speech that Bell did — they oppose the private option, but don't see a responsible political endgame in this session facing an overwhelming majority in favor of the private option, so now it's time to "do the people's business." Given that the Bell amendment was the key "get" in his tactical approach, this would have been a stronger speech to make last week than this week...but perhaps a demonstration of the impasse itself, after a week of failed votes, might have been necessary before some were willing to publicly take this approach. 

In addition to the Bell camp of private option opponents, attention naturally turns to the five Republicans who voted for the private option last year but thus far haven't pushed the yes button this time around, despite the fact that 1) the policy, fully operational for just two months, has been working as intended, with the implementation going as well as even its biggest proponents could have hoped and 2)  the bill is more conservative this year after amendments from Rep. Nate Bell and Rep. John Burris. There is little in the way of substantive policy reasons to explain why Rep. Ann Clemmer, Rep. John Hutchison, Rep. Mary Lou Slinkard, Rep. Les Carnine, and Rep. Allen Kerr supported the measure last spring but are balking this winter.

Clemmer is facing off against French Hill in a Republican primary for the Second District Congressional seat and has concluded that she cannot afford to vote for the private option given the potential Tea Party pushback in the primary. Many Republicans believe that she has made a strategic miscalculation, as the establishment-friendly Hill still plans to hammer her on her 2013 vote. Could Clemmer sense an opportunity to give a Bell-style "get the people's business done" speech, stating opposition to the private option, but ending the impasse as a minority of lawmakers continue block the entire Medicaid budget? 

Hutchison said on the House floor last week that he does not want to leave the people who've gained coverage "out in the cold" but he has concerns over a separate law involving the Health Insurance Marketplace, even though he voted for the law in question. Hutchison met with a DHS official to discuss his concerns yesterday. Hutchison will face a strong Democratic opponent who supports the private option in his bid for re-election, but rumor has it that he may draw a Tea Party opponent in the primary as well. 

Slinkard and Carnine, allies of Rep. Terry Rice, were widely thought to be eventual yes votes based on negotiations last week, but Carnine told Carter he was a solid no last Friday. According to multiple sources, Rice allies wanted to ensure that the Senate voted first in part to make sure that Sen. Bruce Holland, who Rice is challenging in a primary, took the tough vote (Rice is a no, Holland a yes). Rice allies are also widely rumored to have lingering ill feelings toward Carter, Burris and others involved in the maneuvering to get Carter the speakership over Rice (Rice was the presumptive Republican pick; Carter beat him in a last-minute run with Democratic support). Many lawmakers I spoke with believe that Carnine will eventually come around; others believe that he remains angry at Carter's occasionally tough rhetoric last week and has hardened his position. (Interestingly, multiple lawmakers told me that Rep. Jonathan Burnett, another Rice ally, was directly involved in negotiations, making promises that the votes would be there this week if they just waited. Barnett, despite being a middle-of-the-road establishment Republican who's never been shy about accepting federal money in the past, has been a consistent no vote on the private option.)

Finally, most believe that Kerr is a firm no. A bit strange, since Kerr is a Little Rock-based, term-limited, middle-of-the-road Republican.

No more substantive policy changes are coming to the private option — the Bell amendments were as far as supporters were willing to go, not to mention the fact that there is very little chance that the Senate would take up an entirely new bill. That leaves negotiators left trying to convince two more lawmakers to approve a bill they've voted against four times. There are multiple potential avenues to get there, but it's a bit awkward for possible flips at this point to explain why they'd vote for it this week, but not last week, when nothing has really changed. That may be one more challenge for private option negotiators — not just convincing lawmakers to change their votes, but helping them come up with a good reason to explain why. 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (40)

Showing 1-40 of 40

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-40 of 40

Add a comment

More by David Ramsey

  • Abuse again at Arkansas juvenile lockup

    A guard was fired after choking a child at the Alexander Juvenile Assessment and Treatment Center. It’s the latest in a long history of mistreatment at the facility.
    • May 26, 2017
  • Health care policy FAQ

    What proposed state and federal changes mean for the future of health care policy in Arkansas.
    • May 25, 2017
  • The health of a hospital

    The Medicaid expansion helped Baxter County Regional Medical Center survive and thrive, but a federal repeal bill threatens to imperil it and its patients.
    • May 25, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Jason Rapert vs. Wikipedia

    Sen. Jason Rapert against the world: Wikipedia edition.
    • Jan 23, 2016
  • Baseball fans have a new place to stay

    If you missed out on Razorback baseball home games this year because you couldn’t find a great place to stay, your problem is now solved: Staybridge Suites of Fayetteville is now fully renovated and located directly across from Baum Stadium, with free parking for hotel guests.
    • May 22, 2017
  • Auditor Lea caught not telling the truth

    State Auditor Andrea Lea, who began her tenure in statewide office with a degree of competence unseen in some other Republican counterparts (think Treasurer Dennis Milligan particularly), is becoming more deeply mired in a political scandal.
    • Mar 4, 2016

Most Shared

  • So much for a school settlement in Pulaski County

    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's Cynthia Howell got the scoop on what appears to be coming upheaval in the Pulaski County School District along with the likely end of any chance of a speedy resolution of school desegregation issues in Pulaski County.
  • Riverfest calls it quits

    The board of directors of Riverfest, Arkansas's largest and longest running music festival, announced today that the festival will no longer be held. Riverfest celebrated its 40th anniversary in June. A press release blamed competition from other festivals and the rising cost of performers fees for the decision.
  • Football for UA Little Rock

    Andrew Rogerson, the new chancellor at UA Little Rock, has decided to study the cost of starting a major college football team on campus (plus a marching band). Technically, it would be a revival of football, dropped more than 60 years ago when the school was a junior college.
  • Turn to baseball

    When the world threatens to get you down, there is always baseball — an absorbing refuge, an alternate reality entirely unto itself.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation