Supreme Court knocks down limits on federal campaign giving | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Supreme Court knocks down limits on federal campaign giving

Posted By on Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:22 AM

In a vote that dissenting Justice Stephen Breyer said would "open a floodgate" of dollars to control American elections, the Supreme Court ruled today that aggregate limits on federal campaign contributions were unconstitutional.

The ruling — 5-4, along ideological lines — in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (No. 12-536) removes the cap individuals may give to federal candidates and political committees ($48,600 to candidates and $25,000 to committees) over two years. Along with McCutcheon, the individual who filed suit over the limits, the Republican National Committee was an appellant.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts leads off the opinion, which he penned for the majority, by writing, “There is no right more basic in our democracy than the right to participate in electing our political leaders.” 

The New York Times report, which called the decision a sequel to the Citizens United case in which the court defined corporation as people for purposes of campaign contributions, notes that the decision 

chipped away at the central distinction drawn by the Supreme Court in its seminal 1976 campaign finance decision, Buckley v. Valeo. Independent spending, the court said in Buckley, is political speech protected by the First Amendment. But contributions may be capped, the court said, in the name of preventing corruption. The court added that aggregate contribution limits were a “quite modest restraint upon protected political activity” that “serves to prevent evasion” of the base limits.

However, Roberts writes: 

The Government has a strong interest, no less critical to our democratic system, in combatting corruption and its  appearance. We have, however, held that this interest must be limited to a specific kind of corruption — quid pro quo corruption — in order to ensure that the Government’s efforts do not have the effect of restricting the First Amendment right of citizens to choose who shall govern them. For the reasons set forth, we conclude that the aggregate limits on contributions do not further the only governmental interest this Court accepted as legitimate in  Buckley. They instead intrude without justification on a  citizen’s ability to exercise “the most fundamental First Amendment activities.”

Roll Call notes that while many Republicans are celebrating the decision, Sen. John McCain is not:

McCain, who co-authored that 2000 ban on unrestricted “soft” money donations to the parties, called the opinion “tragic.” Asked about the ruling, the Arizona Republican replied: “What can I say? I think it’s really the worst. I think it’s a terrible decision, but I’m not surprised given their decision in Citizens United.”

Tags: , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (12)

Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-12 of 12

Add a comment

More by Leslie Newell Peacock

  • It's 3rd Friday Art Walk in Argenta ...

    It's Third Friday Art Walk in Argenta, and it's beautiful outdoors. So go.
    • Mar 16, 2018
  • Dream comes true: Dreamland Ballroom gets big restoration grant

    The U.S. Department of the Interior and the National Park Service will award a $499,668 improvement grant to Dreamland Ballroom in the historic Taborian Hall building at Ninth and State streets, now the home of Little Rock Flag and Banner.
    • Mar 15, 2018
  • Write your congressmen to support history

    When you're busy cutting the federal budget to the bone so that folks wealthier than God don't have to contribute to the Treasury, no program is too small to ax, right?
    • Mar 15, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: The Thou Shalt Not open line

    • "American Made" sure took a lot of liberties with the fact, including that there was…

    • on March 17, 2018
  • Re: The Thou Shalt Not open line

    • No, I haven't made an effort to see it, Olphart. Friends who have say it's…

    • on March 17, 2018
  • Re: The Thou Shalt Not open line

    • We are deep into the age of Drumpf & the ill effects his vile spoutings…

    • on March 17, 2018

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation