Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Same-sex marriage suit plaintiffs object to stay of Piazza ruling; counties still issuing down to two

Posted By on Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:57 AM

click to enlarge CHERYL MAPLES: In Eureka Springs Saturday for people married as a result of her lawsuit. - KAT WILSON
  • Kat Wilson
  • CHERYL MAPLES: In Eureka Springs Saturday for people married as a result of her lawsuit.
As expected, plaintiffs in the lawsuit that led to Judge Chris Piazza's overturning of the same-sex marriage ban in Arkansas, have told the state Supreme Court that they object to a stay of Piazza's ruling. Now the Supreme Court will deliberate. There's no indication when it might rule.

The plaintiffs's attorneys — Cheryl Maples and Jack Wagoner — say the request is premature because a stay request is also pending before Piazza. It says the state, which wants to fight the ruling, also must demonstrate a likelihood of success on appeal and irreparable harm in the interim. The only irreparable harm would come from a stay, which could continue to deny same-sex couples their constitutional right to marry, the plaintiffs argue.
The harm is not speculative, but immediate and real," they argued.

They dismiss, too, the "confusion" cited by the state and counties. Piazza's ruling clearly requires clerks to issue licenses to same-sex couples. Any other statutes that would suggest clerks must issue licenses only to opposite-sex couples, even if not listed specifically by him, must fall to his core ruling. The plaintiffs who are legally married elsewhere already deal daily with the confusion of being denied rights other married couples are afforded.

 If a stay is granted, such couples will once again be forced to navigate a complex, bewildering, and ever-shifting terrain of uncertainty as to whether they will be respected as a legally married couple by particular federal agencies, private employers, businesses, and particular state and local governmental actors.

They concluded: 

other than references to a variety of lederal cases in which a stay was granted, the Defendants-Appellants provide no argument that they are likely to succeed on appeal, despite an unbroken wave of state and federal cases finding similar state laws to be blatantly unconstitutional.
Here's the plaintiff's argument.
Attorneys for White, Washington, Lonoke and Conway counties — all defendants in the case — also asked for a stay of the ruling. Wagoner filed a separate reply to their argument that there was a lack of "clarity" for clerks on account of other statutes not mentioned by Piazza.

Here's an answer to that argument. .
Wagoner wrote:

The County Clerk Appellants' reliance on the Circuit Court's omission of an express declaration that Ark. Code Ann. 9-l l-208 is invalid also fails. The proper remedy to resolve any uncertainty as to the intended scope of the May 9 Order is to request that the Circuit Court clarify and correct the Order, not to seek a stay. In light ofthis readily available remedy, the County Clerk Appellants cannot show irreparable injury or any of the other requirements for granting a stay
.
The plaintiffs in the case also object to McDaniel's notice of appeal of the ruling to the Supreme Court. His motion said the request is premature with some loose ends before Piazza, including any oversights in failing to deal with other state statutes that unconstituionally retain language referring to marriage as only being allowed between a man and woman.

Here's that motion.
UPDATE: Marion County also followed the legal advice coming out of the Arkansas Association of Counties and related organizations and stopped issuing marriage licenses today. It issued one yesterday. Saline also pulled back this morning. That leaves Washington and Pulaski counties still in the business of following Judge Piazza's ruling that it is unconstitutional for Arkansas county clerks and the state to deny marriage to same-sex couples.

By mid-afternoon, another 62 couples had registered in Pulaski County, David Goins at Fox 16/KARK reported.

Tags: , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Speaking of...

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Jason Rapert vs. Wikipedia

    Sen. Jason Rapert against the world: Wikipedia edition.
    • Jan 23, 2016
  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • IHOP coming down, but .....

    I always scan the Little Rock City Board for items of interest this week and this one caught my eye: A zoning measure required by a proposal to tear down the IHOP at Markham and University.
    • Apr 30, 2016

Most Shared

  • Conspiracy theorists

    Back in 2000, I interviewed Rev. Jerry Falwell on camera in connection with a documentary film of "The Hunting of the President," which Joe Conason and I wrote.
  • Virgil, quick come see

    There goes the Robert E. Lee. But the sentiment that built the monument? It's far from gone.
  • Real reform

    Arkansas voters, once perversely skeptical of complicated ballot issues like constitutional amendments, have become almost comical Pollyannas, ratifying the most shocking laws.
  • The health of a hospital

    The Medicaid expansion helped Baxter County Regional Medical Center survive and thrive, but a federal repeal bill threatens to imperil it and its patients.

Visit Arkansas

Paddling the Fourche Creek Urban Water Trail

Paddling the Fourche Creek Urban Water Trail

Underutilized waterway is a hidden gem in urban Little Rock

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation