Legislators decide 11 years in prison on wrongful convictions undeserving of compensation | Arkansas Blog

Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Legislators decide 11 years in prison on wrongful convictions undeserving of compensation

Posted By on Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:03 PM

click to enlarge GYRONNE BUCKLEY: Justice denied. - KTHV
  • KTHV
  • GYRONNE BUCKLEY: Justice denied.
Read here the story of Gyronne Buckley, who originally got a life sentence in Clark County for supposedly selling $40 in crack to an informant in 1999. He had no prior criminal record. The informant was testifying to get out of a charge of his own. The state fought for years to keep from revealing evidence, a videotape, useful to Buckley's defense. It showed the informant's poor recollection of events. A federal judge found 38 places that the informant's testimony could be impeached.

The legal case was long and winding. At last, Buckley got an order for a new trial and a special prosecutor to consider whether the case should be prosecuted again.

The special prosecutor conceded Buckley’s factual claim was accurate that the prosecution had violated his right to due process by failing to disclose the exculpatory videotape to his trial lawyer. On November 1, 2010 the charges were dismissed and Buckley was released after 11-1/2 years of wrongful imprisonment.

Buckley went to the state Claims Commission for compensation. Late last year, it voted 5-0, over Attorney General Dustin McDaniel's objection, to give him $460,000.

Such claims must be approved by the legislature. McDaniel went before legislators to argue that Buckley had not been harmed or fouled by violation of his constitutional rights or by spending 11.5 years in jail. Paying him would set a bad precedent, he argued.

End of the story: The legislative panel today reversed and dismissed the claim.

Want to see a bad precedent? Here's one: No consequences when the state puts a first offender in jail for 11 years for a drug deal based on a dubious witness protected from exposure by prosecutors. 

PS — A prosecutor notes that the state claims that prosecutors were not provided with the videotape by investigators in the first trial and thus could have been unaware of it. But prosecutors continued to fight Buckley's use of that evidence after its existence became known in the appeals process.

Tags: , ,


Favorite

Comments (19)

Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

Slideshows

  • Arkansas vs Ole Miss at War Memorial stadium in Little Rock, Saturday, Oct. 13, 2018. After leading for much of the game, Arkansas lost 37-33 when Ole Miss scored the game winning Touchdown with less that 2 minutes left. 
  • Margaret Clark Adventure Park
    New sculptures, preschoolers play area dedicated in Riverfront Park in Little Rock.

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Friday: News headlines and open line

    • When the millennials blame the baby-boomers for today's environmental issues, I remind them to turn…

    • on December 14, 2018
  • Re: Judge strikes down Obamacare

    • Damned humans! How dare they get sick! They oughta know better! Guess they're not good…

    • on December 14, 2018
  • Re: Friday: News headlines and open line

    • Vanessa, clothes lines are a great start, my wife has purchased one for me to…

    • on December 14, 2018
 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation