Lawyer says statewide alcohol petitions invalid | Arkansas Blog

Monday, July 21, 2014

Lawyer says statewide alcohol petitions invalid

Posted By on Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:38 PM

ALCOHOL SALES PETITIONS
  • ALCOHOL SALES PETITIONS

Elizabeth Robben Murray,
a Friday Firm lawyer and veteran of ballot initiative battles, wrote the secretary of state today in behalf of a committee that opposes a statewide vote on the sale of alcohol in Arkansas.

In a letter for the Let Local Communities Decide for Themselves committee, Murray said the Arkansas Constitution provides that initiative petitions for statewide ballot measures must be submitted not less than four months before the election. The petitions were submitted July 7. The election is Nov. 4. She said the Constitutional provision is "self-executing," thus not dependent on statutory provisions.

Murray wrote that the petitions failed to meet the deadline and the office should refuse to certify the measure. She also wrote the office should consider no additional signatures.

The proposal to allow retail alcohol statewide is being backed by an as-yet unspecified group of retailers who back a committee Let Arkansas Decide. The group submitted about 85,000 signatures July 7, needing 78,133 of registered voters. Late last week, the secretary of state said the drive was short by 17,133 and gave the group 30 days to gather them.

The opinion from Murray also has implications for the drive to put an initiated act on the ballot Nov. 4 to raise the minimum wage from $6.25 to $8.50 an hour by 2017. That drive submitted petitions July 7 as well. It needs 62,507 signatures and it also fell short and was given 30 days to obtain more signatures.

David Couch, attorney for the alcohol measure, contends that, by statute, when a legal deadline falls on a holiday or weekend (July 4 was a state holiday and state offices were closed), then the deadline is extended to the next business day, or July 7.

The July 7 deadline was set and published in the election calendar issued by Secretary of State Mark Martin, so if a legal contest arises on this issue, his office seems likely to have to join in the defense.

I asked Murray who was backing her effort. She said organizational papers would be filed "in a timely manner."

I'd reported previously that Friday Firm lawyers had been receiving papers related to the alcohol drive. Some religious organizations typically oppose most alcohol measures, but the business interest with the greatest stake in the battle are so-called "county line liquor stores," which enjoy rich sales from businesses in counties neighboring dry counties with big populations. Such operations can be found statewide, because about half of Arkansas's 75 counties are dry. But significant operations can be found on the Saline and Faulkner borders in Pulaski County, in Conway County and in Greene and Poinsett Counties, among others. Local option petition campaigns are underway in Saline, Faulkner and Craighead counties, but they operate under different deadlines than the statewide initiatives. The Faulkner petitions haven't been submitted yet.

UPDATE: It's more than the county line liquor stores owners. I've gotten a copy of a letter sent by the Arkansas Beverage Retailers Association, representing all liquor stores. It says a committee is organizing to fight the proposal. It said it would be "catastrophic" to "county line" stores, but also have "dire consequences" for existing stores in wet counties because major retailers such as Walmart, Target and Walgreen could enter the business in competition (actually, not without a change in another law that prevents chain-store ownership of liquor stores). The letter announces a mass meeting July 22 and also says the committee will be Let the Local Communities Decide for Themselves, the name of the committee Murray said she represented. UPDATE: An industry source says only a small percentage of the state's 450 liquor stores belong to the association and owners of Conway County liquor stores lead the group.

This potential for increased competition, precisely, is why alcohol consumers would be inclined to favor the measure.)



The Republican Party has been monitoring the minimum wage campaign because it's expected to be a key campaign tool in the November election. Democrats favor it. Republicans oppose an increase in the minimum wage.

Here's the relevant constitutional language:

Initiative petitions for state-wide measures shall be filed with the Secretary of State not less than four months before the election at which they are to be voted upon; provided, that at least thirty days before the aforementioned filing, the proposed measure shall have been published once, at the expense of the petitioners, in some paper of general circulation. 

And as to execution:

This section shall be self-executing, and all its provisions shall be treated as mandatory, but laws may be enacted to facilitate its operation. No legislation shall be enacted to restrict, hamper or impair the exercise of the rights herein reserved to the people.



The Arkansas Code is clear in, for example, election laws in saying this:

If an election law deadline occurs on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the deadline shall be the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.

But a statute can't amend the plain language of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is often presented with plain language challenges and sometimes finds ways around the seeming dictates of such language. This could be interesting. And high stakes. And if the liquor stores succeed in derailing the amendment, they'll have Mark Martin to thank.

The secretary of state's office said it had received the letter and is reviewing it.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments (17)

Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-17 of 17

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Former Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel applauds Trump's EPA choice of climate change denier Scott Pruitt

    Dustin McDaniel gives the thumbs up to a man set to dismantle EPA regulations.
    • Dec 8, 2016
  • Arkansas legislature rejects bipartisan effort to study race relations

    On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council soundly rejected a bipartisan effort by two senators to to create a temporary legislative subcommittee to study race relations in the state.
    • Sep 15, 2017
  • Trump immigration protest at LR: Quick and fierce

    It was not even 24 hours ago that Sophia Said, director of the Interfaith Center; City Director Kathy Webb and others decided to organize a protest today of Donald Trump's executive order that has left people from Muslim countries languishing in airports or unable to come to the US at all — people with visas, green cards,a  post-doc graduate student en route to Harvard, Google employees abroad, families. I got the message today before noon; others didn't find out until it was going on. But however folks found out, they turned out in huge numbers, more than thousand men, women and children, on the grounds of the state Capitol to listen to speakers from all faiths and many countries.
    • Jan 29, 2017

Most Viewed

  • Proposed child holding site in Arkansas 5 miles from WWII Japanese-American internment camp

    One big difference between Rohwer and today: The parents kept at Rohwer in World War II weren't separated from their children.
  • LR woman sues Louisville police over failures in rape investigation

    Salisa Luster Harrison, who now lives in Little Rock, Tuesday filed a federal lawsuit in Louisville, Ky., alleging multiple failures by the Louisville police investigating a sexual assault of her more than 10 years ago.
  • Baby gorilla born at zoo

    The Little Rock Zoo has a happy announcement: The birth of a healthy baby gorilla. The baby, whose sex has not been determined, was born to Sekani, who came to the zoo in 2004 from Toronto; her baby is her third. The father of the baby is a silverback, Kivu, and he is being "very attentive" to his first child, the zoo reports. Kivu came to the zoo in 2016 from Santa Barbara.
  • All in the family: Ten relatives of top executives were on payroll at PFH, the nonprofit troubled by corruption scandals

    Preferred Family Healthcare, the Medicaid-enriched nonprofit with a vast network of service providers in Arkansas that gobbles up tens of millions of dollars in state funding annually, has been in the news frequently this year because of its connection to multiple federal corruption cases. According to the most recently available tax filings, in 2015 ten family members of top executive were on the payroll, drawing salaries from PFH — including relatives of all four of the executives who were put on leave in the wake of the scandals. Three of these family members were making more than $100,000.
  • Full day of events at Stifft Station Pop-up on June 23

    It's a day of celebration of one of my long-held dreams: that the stretch of Markham between Pine and Kavanaugh in Little Rock be turned into three lanes with a turning lane in the middle and wider sidewalks.

Most Recent Comments

Slideshows

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation