Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Conflicting opinons on Affordable Care Act

Posted By on Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:15 AM

UPDATE: Here are two separate judicial decisions. One is judicial activism, but conservatives will love it.

* A WIN FOR ACTIVISM: A D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel has ruled 2-1 (two Republicans in the majority) that participants in federally operated health insurance exchanges in 36 states cannot qualify for federal subsidies. These are the states, including Arkansas, that didn't set up their own health insurance marketplaces and left it to the government.

The ruling does not affect the private option version of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. But some 40,000 Arkansans have signed up for the exchange, most of them receiving subsidies. About 5 million Americans are receiving benefits in the affected states.

* A WIN FOR THE OBAMCARE LAWNot long after the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled 3-0 that indeed federally run exchanges COULD qualify for subsidies.

In the 4th Circuit decision, Gregory wrote that it's "clear that widely available tax credits are essential to fulfilling the Act’s primary goals and that Congress was aware of their importance when drafting the bill." He noted that only 16 state-run Obamacare exchanges are currently in place and that the economic framework for the law would "crumble" without federal exchange subsidies.

"Furthermore, without an exception to the individual mandate, millions more Americans unable to purchase insurance without the credits would be forced to pay a penalty that Congress never envisioned imposing on them," he wrote. "The IRS Rule avoids both these unforeseen and undesirable consequences and thereby advances the true purpose and means of the Act."



Short run: Status quo.

The Obama administration will ask for a ruling by the entire D.C. Circuit. Opponents can do the same in the 4th Circuit. Whatever either court decides will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. With a conflict between the circuits looming, the Supreme Court will have to enter the battle.

A practical battle looms in states that didn't set up exchanges if the adverse D.C. Circuit decision holds. Will they really insist that working taxpayers be stripped of federal subsidies in a fit of ideological zeal to continue their battle against Obamacare?

Normally, conservative Republicans don't like judges who mess with the laws of Congress and state legislatures. Except when they like the outcome.

David Ramsey has backgrounded this fight for us previously. And also here.

He notes that the average premium for people who gets subsidies in Arkansas is $94 a month. Without the subsidies, it would be $387. So, sure, if this opinion holds, can I get a Republican vote for royally screwing those 36,000 Arkies (90 percent of those on the exchange get subsidies)?

PS — Tom Cotton, naturally, praises the D.C. judicial activism, which dissenter Harry Edwards describes as just an effort to gut the law. If you can't pay for your own health coverage, Tom Cotton says, "tough." Cotton calls the subsidies "unlawful," in a news release issue either before or maliciously disregarding the 4th Circuit ruling.

Tags: ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Speaking of Obamacare, insurance Exchanges

Comments (26)

Showing 1-26 of 26

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-26 of 26

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

Most Shared

  • Former state board of education chair Sam Ledbetter weighs in on Little Rock millage vote

    Ledbetter, the former state Board of Education chair who cast the decisive vote in 2015 to take over the LRSD, writes that Education Commissioner Johnny Key "has shown time and again that he is out of touch with our community and the needs of the district." However, Ledbetter supports the May 9 vote as a positive for the district's students and staff.

Visit Arkansas

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Haralson, Smith named to Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame

Chuck Haralson and Ken Smith were inducted into the Arkansas Tourism Hall of Fame during the 43rd annual Governor’s Conference on Tourism

Most Viewed

  • Death watch includes a family reunion, arranged by a victim's family

    The execution of Kenneth Williams for his 1999 slaying of Cecil Boren during a prison escape remains scheduled for 7 p.m. tonight, though actions in state and federal courts are anticipated in the final hours.
  • New complaint filed in Kenneth Williams case

    Lawyers for Kenneth Williams filed a new lawsuit this morning in Pulaski Circuit Court claiming that his execution tonight would cause unconstitutional cruel or unusual punishment.
  • Griffen asks probe of Ark. Supreme Court and AG's office conduct

    At a press conference today at the Doubletree Hotel just across from the Pulaski County Courthouse, Pulaski County Fifth Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen and his attorneys announced that he has asked the Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission to investigate the conduct of the entire Arkansas Supreme Court, and asked the director of the Arkansas Committee on Professional Conduct to investigate the conduct of Attorney General Leslie Rutledge and several others in the AG's office, related to what Griffen and his attorneys claim were forbidden ex parte conversations between the Supreme Court and the AG's office.
  • Can the Marijuana Commission receive paid travel?

    An official opinion from Attorney General Leslie Rutledge touches lightly on the many ways in which the medical marijuana amendment creates new legal concerns.
  • Arkansas Medicaid 'savings' will produce some losers

    The state offers an optimistic outlook on Gov. Asa Hutchinson's plans to reduce the number covered by the state's expanded Medicaid health coverage. There's reason for questions.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

Slideshows

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation