Fayetteville to resist Uber's unregulated operation in the city | Arkansas Blog

Friday, August 29, 2014

Fayetteville to resist Uber's unregulated operation in the city

Posted By on Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:43 AM

click to enlarge screen_shot_2014-08-29_at_6.39.37_am.png
I got a response late last night from Fayetteville to an inquiry about plans for Uber to begin operations in the city this weekend, with an opening gimmick of free rides for people who use the cell phone app to order up car service.

Uber will not be welcome to operate without meeting regulatory requirements applied to taxis and drivers will be ticketed if they do so.

Correspondence about Uber in July made clear that the city believed the payment of money to drivers to transport people — no matter how Uber characterized the transaction — put the company under laws that regulate taxi services. Uber styles itself as a communications app that puts drivers with riders and takes a cut of the fare they charge. The letters from Fayetteville raise questions about lack of registration to do business in Arkansas, insurance, driver qualifications and other issues. It notes that efforts by Uber to operate in other cities outside regulatory requirements had met court roadblocks. July 16, City Attorney Kit Williams advised the company not to seek to hire drivers or operate in the city. (The letter also went to Lyft, another so-called ride-sharing service.)



Uber has apparently forged ahead without any change in status. The Northwest Arkansas newspapers wrote about the situation this morning. It couldn't reach Uber (nor could I yesterday). But it made clear the city planned to ticket Uber drivers who operated in the city without permits. It quoted Kit Williams:

"If they try to operate, their drivers will almost certainly be ticketed by the police," Williams said. "The app shows where the drivers are. It's very difficult for them to operate totally in the shadows with this system."


The city of Little Rock has notified Uber and Lyft of the need to have permits to operate here. Uber has indicated through intermediaries that it is open to some form of city oversight of the operation, though it is not yet clear how far it is willing to go in terms of the existing taxi ordinance. The subject is to come up at a City Board meeting in the near future. In Fayetteville as in Little Rock, taxi operators have objected to unregulated operation. Uber has taken different approaches around the country. In some places it has begun operating unilaterally and fought court actions. In others it has worked out operation under regulatory schemes.

Uber has targeted a number of college towns for its car service. 

Tags: ,

From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (9)

Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-9 of 9

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Charter school accountability: Non-existent in Arkansas

    A state audit finds charter school spending violated state law, but the state Education Department says it has no responsibility for ensuring proper management of charter schools. Say what?
    • Mar 5, 2016
  • Is Arkansas in or out on Kobach voter data effort?

    The Washington Post has published a map that counts Arkansas as among states that will "partially comply" with a sweeping request for voter data by the so-called election integrity commission set up by Donald Trump in an effort to cast doubt on Hillary Clinton's 3 million-vote popular defeat of him in 2016.
    • Jul 2, 2017
  • Policy group urges opposition to new charter seats in Little Rock

    The Arkansas Public Policy Panel is urging supporters of the Little Rock School District to tell state Board of Education members they oppose applications to be heard this week to dramatically expand the number of charter school seats in the Little Rock School District.
    • Mar 9, 2016

Most Shared

Most Viewed

  • LR told D.C. before it told city residents it wasn't going after Amazon

    Little Rock told Amazon it wouldn't be applying as a site for a new headquarters in a full-page ad published in this morning's Washington Post. It kind of jokes that Amazon would just mess up this wonderful city.
  • The LR chamber does the public's business. Is it accountable? Blue Hog on the case.

    Matt Campbell, lawyer and Blue Hog Report blogger, has sent a Freedom of Information Act request to Jay Chessir, director of the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce, and Mayor Mark Stodola related to the publicity stunt yesterday  built around withdrawing from the mayor's rash pronouncement that the city would seek an Amazon HQ2 project even though the city  didn't meet the company's criteria.

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation