Arkansas Supreme Court sets back class action case over diabetes drug Actos | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Arkansas Supreme Court sets back class action case over diabetes drug Actos

Posted By on Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM

click to enlarge DRUG CLAIM: Diabetese drug targeted in class action suit.
  • DRUG CLAIM: Diabetese drug targeted in class action suit.
The Arkansas Supreme Court, asked by a federal court in Louisiana to clarify a point of state law in a class action case over the diabetes drug Actos, answered it in a way unfavorable to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, Greg Bowerman, filed on behalf of taxpayers in a Saline County lawsuit. But his case was consolidated with other cases in the Louisiana court. The suit asks that the expenditure of public money under government medical programs to provide patients with Actos to be construed as an "illegal exaction," or illegal expenditure, of tax money because the drug has been found to be cancer-causing and also because the maker of the drug, Takeda, allegedly made false clams about the drug. Asked by the federal court if an illegal exaction claim was allowed by Arkansas law, the Arkansas Supreme Court said no. It said the public money was legally spent on drugs prescribed by a physician and thus couldn't be recovered from the defendant pharmaceutical manufacturer under that theory.

The majority in the 4-3 decision split on a second question aimed at determining whether a previous ruling by the court still applied. In it, the court found an illegal exaction when asphalt contractors were paid for inferior asphalt in a price-fixing scheme. The Arkansas court majority said that decision need not be considered because there was no illegal exaction and so the court didn't need to get into the product liability claim. Justices Paul Danielson, Donald Corbin and Cliff Hoofman wrote in dissent. They said the old case supported the proposition that a illegal exaction claim was possible against a private party — such as a drug company — when the non-government party acted improperly with government money. That precedent should apply or be overruled, they suggested.



Sign up for the Daily Update email
Favorite

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • The inspiring Hillary Clinton

    Hillary Clinton's campaign for president illustrates again the double standard applied to women. Some writers get it. They even find the supposedly unlikable Clinton inspiring.
    • Oct 16, 2016
  • ADEQ denies C&H Hog Farm permit

    The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality has denied a new permit for the C&H Hog Farms' concentrated animal feeding operation near Mount Judea (Newton County). This is a big and somewhat surprising victory for critics who have viewed C&H's large-scale pig farm and the pig waste it generates as an existential threat to the Buffalo National River.
    • Jan 10, 2018
  • UPDATE: Hutchinson moves to cover himself on cut to War Memorial Stadium

    Gov. Asa Hutchinson apparently felt the burn from KARK's exclusive Tuesday night on his plans to cut state support of War Memorial Stadium in half beginning July 1, 2018. He has a so-far secret plan to make the stadium self-sustaining. We bet that doesn't include state support.
    • Oct 20, 2016

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

 

© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation