Arkansas Supreme Court sets back class action case over diabetes drug Actos | Arkansas Blog

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Arkansas Supreme Court sets back class action case over diabetes drug Actos

Posted By on Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM

click to enlarge DRUG CLAIM: Diabetese drug targeted in class action suit.
  • DRUG CLAIM: Diabetese drug targeted in class action suit.
The Arkansas Supreme Court, asked by a federal court in Louisiana to clarify a point of state law in a class action case over the diabetes drug Actos, answered it in a way unfavorable to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, Greg Bowerman, filed on behalf of taxpayers in a Saline County lawsuit. But his case was consolidated with other cases in the Louisiana court. The suit asks that the expenditure of public money under government medical programs to provide patients with Actos to be construed as an "illegal exaction," or illegal expenditure, of tax money because the drug has been found to be cancer-causing and also because the maker of the drug, Takeda, allegedly made false clams about the drug. Asked by the federal court if an illegal exaction claim was allowed by Arkansas law, the Arkansas Supreme Court said no. It said the public money was legally spent on drugs prescribed by a physician and thus couldn't be recovered from the defendant pharmaceutical manufacturer under that theory.

The majority in the 4-3 decision split on a second question aimed at determining whether a previous ruling by the court still applied. In it, the court found an illegal exaction when asphalt contractors were paid for inferior asphalt in a price-fixing scheme. The Arkansas court majority said that decision need not be considered because there was no illegal exaction and so the court didn't need to get into the product liability claim. Justices Paul Danielson, Donald Corbin and Cliff Hoofman wrote in dissent. They said the old case supported the proposition that a illegal exaction claim was possible against a private party — such as a drug company — when the non-government party acted improperly with government money. That precedent should apply or be overruled, they suggested.



Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • One dead, two wounded in early morning shooting

    KARK's Susanne Brunner reports that one person has been killed and two wounded in a shooting shortly after 1 a.m. this morning near Roosevelt Road and Cross Street.
    • Apr 17, 2019
  • Reality bites at Little Rock City Hall; spending must be cut

    A followup to Rebekah Hall's earlier report on Little Rock Mayor Frank Scott Jr.'s announcement that cuts will be necessary in the city budget in part to pay for "priorities," such as his desire to expand the police force, but also to deal with the reality often mentioned here of stagnant to decling city sales tax revenue. Some quick ideas on that:
    • Apr 17, 2019
  • Speaking of hard times in newspapers: Democrat-Gazette's move to digital

    Word continues to filter in of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette's pullback from statewide circulation of a print daily edition of the newspaper — the latest from the Hot Springs area, just 50 or so miles down the road from Little Rock. Subscribers there were told home delivery of a print paper would end in May.
    • Apr 16, 2019
  • More »

Readers also liked…

Most Recent Comments


© 2019 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation