Supreme Court will hear no oral arguments in challenge of minimum wage law | Arkansas Blog

Monday, October 13, 2014

Supreme Court will hear no oral arguments in challenge of minimum wage law

Posted By on Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:06 PM

The Arkansas Supreme Court today issued a brief order denying oral arguments in the lawsuit filed by millionaire Jackson T. Stephens Jr. to get a proposed increase in the minimum wage removed from the ballot.

That means the case will be decided on arguments in briefs and the findings of a special master that supporters of the initiated act had met petition signature requirements. A key question remains whether the secretary of state properly extended a deadline for petitions from July 4, a state holiday, to July 7, the next regular business day.

The secretary of state's office today filed its brief defending its certification of the proposal for the Nov. 4 ballot. It also defended extending a "cure" period for defects in petitions originally submitted. This is a key part of Stephens' complaint. He contends defects — such as in legitimacy of notary signatures — should have caused the petitions to fail the original review. He doesn't argue that additional signatures submitted later were sufficient to qualify the measure for the ballot.

Stephens' attorney argues that the special master, John Robbins, erred in saying petition signatures should not be held to be facially invalid because some of the notary signatures were not those of the notary. They shouldn't be counted toward the initial total that qualified the petitioners for more time.

Tags: ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (15)

Showing 1-15 of 15

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-15 of 15

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Jason Rapert vs. Wikipedia

    Sen. Jason Rapert against the world: Wikipedia edition.
    • Jan 23, 2016
  • Is Arkansas in or out on Kobach voter data effort?

    The Washington Post has published a map that counts Arkansas as among states that will "partially comply" with a sweeping request for voter data by the so-called election integrity commission set up by Donald Trump in an effort to cast doubt on Hillary Clinton's 3 million-vote popular defeat of him in 2016.
    • Jul 2, 2017
  • Super Bowl line

    Over to you.
    • Feb 7, 2016

Most Shared

  • City ethics update; campaign limit was supposed to help the little guy

    Some more history on the Little Rock city ordinance that limits candidates for mayor and City Board to raising campaign funds to five months before the November 2018 election. It raises questions not only about Warwick Sabin's fund-raising tactics, but also Mayor Mark Stodola's carryover money.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation