The election now a factor in Supreme Court deliberations on same-sex marriage case | Arkansas Blog

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

The election now a factor in Supreme Court deliberations on same-sex marriage case

Posted By on Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM

click to enlarge JUDGE CHRIS PIAZZA: Does Tuesday's election become a factor in the Supreme Court considering of his ruling in same-sex marriage case? I say yes.
  • JUDGE CHRIS PIAZZA: Does Tuesday's election become a factor in the Supreme Court considering of his ruling in same-sex marriage case? I say yes.
Tuesday's election sweep for Republicans has implications far beyond the people who hold the offices they won.

Appointed boards with great influence come to mind. Pollution Control, Education, Public Service Commission, Ethics Commission.

Also the courts. Arkansas courts, particularly appellate courts, have a rich history of reading political winds in their decisions. The corporate influence that appears in next year's Arkansas Supreme Court majority is important because it generally dovetails with Republican Party outlook.

Which brings us to a more pressing matter — the pending appeal on same-sex marriage bans in Arkansas. Politically ambitious Supreme Court justices who owe debts to Republican political contributors are not good candidates to exhibit courage in the face of contrary popular sentiment and threats from the even bigger Republican legislative majority, some of whom have already expressed the desire to impeach or remove judges who rule in favor of marriage equality.

In short: Does the Tuesday election sweep by Republicans amount to a negative influence on whether the Supreme Court will uphold Circuit Judge Chris Piazza's invalidation of the ban on same-sex marriage? I think you have to answer yes.

Anecdote: Well-placed sources say John Goodson, the powerful class action lawyer who's married to a Supreme Court justice, had predicted in several places that the Supreme Court would allow votes to proceed, for example, on the alcohol initiative. It was defeated, but a court shouldn't fear blowback when people are given the vote, which the court repeatedly did this year. In the marriage case, the people HAVE voted. Against it.

The Arkansas Supreme Court hears arguments Nov. 20. The same day, a federal district judge in Little Rock will hear arguments in a similar federal lawsuit that won't be affected by whatever the Arkansas court decides.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

From the ArkTimes store


Comments (7)

Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-7 of 7

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Womack gets questions. He doesn't answer

    The resistance mustered a turnout for a rare public appearance by U.S. Rep. Steve Womack, which meant a ferry ride from Peel, Ark., and a drive almost to Missouri. He didn't seem happy to see them.
    • Aug 22, 2017
  • Democratic Party calls for resignation of Jake Files

    The Arkansas Democratic Party says Republican Sen. Jake Files of Fort Smith should resign over news about handling of state General Improvement Fund money that wound up with him, not the project for which it was intended.
    • Aug 22, 2017
  • Rutledge touts effort to allow discrimination against gay people

    Attorney General Leslie Rutledge is braying about her intervention in yet another out-of-state lawsuit — this one to protect a Washington state florist who doesn't want to sell flowers to gay people for use at their wedding.
    • Aug 22, 2017
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Judge Griffen: Why black lives matter

    Another few words from Judge Wendell Griffen growing from the controversy over the sale of Black Lives Matter T-shirts at the state black history museum — removed by the administration and restored after protests from Griffen and others stirred by a story in the Arkansas Times:
    • Mar 13, 2016
  • Is Arkansas in or out on Kobach voter data effort?

    The Washington Post has published a map that counts Arkansas as among states that will "partially comply" with a sweeping request for voter data by the so-called election integrity commission set up by Donald Trump in an effort to cast doubt on Hillary Clinton's 3 million-vote popular defeat of him in 2016.
    • Jul 2, 2017
  • More on how highways were used to wipe out "blight" of non-white neighborhoods

    Vox, a news website that concerns itself with energy and other issues, has a fine piece, including before and after images, on the history of the U.S. interstate system and why roads were built through the middle of cities (unless people of influence stopped them — see Manhattan, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.)
    • Mar 22, 2016

Most Shared

Most Recent Comments

  • Re: Tuesday's open line

    • Sorry--I posted the wrong list above. The current list is for the class of 2021…

    • on August 23, 2017
  • Re: Tuesday's open line

    • To distract from the Trump craziness, here is the annual Beloit College Mindset List. It…

    • on August 23, 2017
  • Re: Womack gets questions. He doesn't answer

    • Big thanks to the Indivisible members who took the time to make that out-of-the-way trip…

    • on August 22, 2017



© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation