Issue 3 presents an issue for crayon gifts | Arkansas Blog

Monday, November 17, 2014

Issue 3 presents an issue for crayon gifts

Posted By on Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:24 PM

click to enlarge GIVE 'EM BACK: The chair ruled crayon gifts not allowed.
  • GIVE 'EM BACK: The chair ruled crayon gifts not allowed.
Benji Hardy reports from a legislation Education Committee meeting today that a group of parents and students appeared today and give members boxes of crayons as part of their presentation.

Sen. Joyce Elliott said the legislators would have to give the crayons back because of Issue 3, the recently approved constitutional amendments on ethics.

If things happened as described, I'm not sure Elliott is right. The amendment prohibits legislators from accepting anything of value, with some specific exceptions, from " a lobbyist, a person acting on behalf of a lobbyist, or a person employing or contracting with a lobbyist." But the amendment defines a lobbyist as someone who is paid or expends at least $400 on lobbying activities. If there were no conventionally paid lobbyists in the group, or anyone acting in behalf of such a person or a person who contracts otherwise with a lobbyist, the gifts were OK. Unless they were worth more than $400.

David Couch, who helped write the ethics measure, offers this opinion:

To get to the bottom of the crayon controversy you’d have to ask – who paid for the crayons and not who delivered the crayons.

If the AEA paid for them they couldn’t take them.

If it was the Forest Park PTA then I think it would be ok

Rep. Duncan Baird, an advocate of the no-freebies rule, observes on Twitter:

@ArkansasBlog If they were also made available for citizens attending, It might fall under exception for items available to gen public, too

Then comes lobbyist Cammie Boggess:

@ArkansasBlog Doesn't the State Association of PTAs have a lobbyist, and wouldn't that then prevent the Forest Park PTA from giving?

Easy solution to all this. No gifts.

Tags: , , ,

Sign up for the Daily Update email

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

  • Where's the outrage?

    Am I the only person, apart from federal prosecutors, outraged about the criminal enterprise that inveigled itself into a privileged position as an Arkansas taxpayer-financed human services provider to the tune, today, of $43 million a year?
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Where's the outrage?

    • Jun 21, 2018
  • Rutledge opponent hits her socializing with corporate interests

    Mike Lee, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, has criticized Attorney General Leslie Rutledge over recent reports of her participation at private meetings where corporate interests make big contributions to a political group she heads for access to state legal officers.
    • Jun 21, 2018
  • More »

Readers also liked…

  • Your daily dose of Jason Rapert

    Sen. Jason Rapert really, really didn't like it when a KATV reporter asked him about the hypocrisy of his political arguments.
    • Feb 4, 2017
  • Arkansas legislature rejects bipartisan effort to study race relations

    On Friday, the Arkansas Legislative Council soundly rejected a bipartisan effort by two senators to to create a temporary legislative subcommittee to study race relations in the state.
    • Sep 15, 2017
  • Campus gun bill clears committee

    The so-called compromise amendment that will allow anyone 25 or older with a training certificate carry a concealed weapon on public college campuses was approved in a Senate committee this afternoon.
    • Feb 21, 2017

People who saved…

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments



© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation