One other Supreme Court holdover: On election petition law | Arkansas Blog

Saturday, January 3, 2015

One other Supreme Court holdover: On election petition law

Posted By on Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:45 AM

Lawyer David Couch reminds me of one other notable lawsuit left hanging at the end of the Arkansas Supreme Court's term for 2014 that now might have different personnel voting on the outcome.

It is the challenge of Act 1413 of 2013, which was aimed at making it harder to place initiatives on the ballot through the petition process. Circuit Judge Mary McGowan ruled that the law unconstitutionally imposed new restrictions and erred particularly in setting tougher standards for paid canvassers than non-paid canvassers. Support for the law came from the business community and particularly from the Oaklawn and Southland casinos, which would prefer not to have to contend with efforts to broaden casino gambling in Arkansas beyond the existing duopoly.

Paul Spencer of the grassroots good government group, Regnat Populus, and Neil Sealy of Arkansas Community Organizations were plaintiffs in the lawsuit. It drew support from across the spectrum, including some conservative voices that have been active in past initiative campaigns.

The state appealed the ruling. Briefing was completed in the case Nov. 4. The Supreme Court has been silent since.

I noted yesterday that the appeal of the same-sex marriage ruling, completed Nov. 19, still has not been decided by the court, along with a couple of other cases argued in December.

In the November election voters approved a constitutional amendment, Issue 2, aimed at making it harder to petition for the ballot, but it didn't cover ground in the law that was struck down by McGowan. It set a threshhold of 75 percent valid signatures in an initial submission before a petition drive could qualify for additional time to gather more signatures. Previously, petitioners needed only to submit a sufficient number of signatures, but they didn't have to be fully validated in the initial count for an extension of time. Error rates on signatures have varied dramatically in past petition campaigns.

Presumably this case, if it has not been decided an an opinion completed but not filed for some reason, will have to be "reconferenced" like the marriage case so that new Justices Robin Wynne and Rhonda Wood may weigh in.

Tags: , , , ,



Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Among the last words from Kenneth Williams: 'Finger Lickin' Good Fried Chicken'

    What's purported to be a final-words essay from condemned prisoner Kenneth Williams was distributed today by Deborah Robinson, a freelance journalist in Arkansas.  He reflects on his execution, his victims, reactions of inmates and big servings of fried chicken, which he says are given to all inmates on execution days.
    • Apr 27, 2017
  • French Hill votes against disaster aid to Puerto Rico

    Republican U.S. Rep. French Hill alone among Arkansas's House delegation voted last week against a measure that provided $36.5 billion in disaster aid, a portion  for hurricane-ravaged Puerto Rico as well as money for wildfire response and to support the flood insurance program.
    • Oct 14, 2017
  • Presidential thriller, co-author Bill Clinton, coming to bookstores in 2018

    June 2018 is the expected publication date for a novel collaboration by former President Bill Clinton and crime writer James Patterson.
    • May 9, 2017


  • Arkansas vs Ole Miss at War Memorial stadium in Little Rock, Saturday, Oct. 13, 2018. After leading for much of the game, Arkansas lost 37-33 when Ole Miss scored the game winning Touchdown with less that 2 minutes left. 
  • Margaret Clark Adventure Park
    New sculptures, preschoolers play area dedicated in Riverfront Park in Little Rock.

Most Recent Comments


© 2018 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation