Judge enjoins Little Rock, North Little Rock payments to chambers of commerce | Arkansas Blog

Monday, January 5, 2015

Judge enjoins Little Rock, North Little Rock payments to chambers of commerce

Posted By on Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:46 PM

click to enlarge JUDGE MACKIE PIERCE: Rules for taqxpayers in lawsuit over city payments to chanbers of commerce.
  • JUDGE MACKIE PIERCE: Rules for taqxpayers in lawsuit over city payments to chanbers of commerce.
Circuit Judge Mackie Pierce today granted a partial summary judgment in favor of a taxpayer lawsuit over payments by the cities of Little Rock and North Little Rock to chambers of commerce.

Pierce held that the payments violated the state constitutional prohibition against municipal appropriations to private corporations and enjoined any further payments.

Little Rock, for example, gives $200,000 a year to the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of its business development activities. It amounts to a taxpayer subsidy of chamber operations. Since a legal question was been raised about the practice, the city has attempted a procedural fix by calling the payment a service contract, even though the amount has been fixed and unrelated to any specific services. The North Little Rock City Council has provided similar subsidies to the local chamber and other economic development agencies.

Pierce's ruling after a hearing today was on the core question of a constitutional violation. He did not reach other parts of the lawsuit over the amount of illegal exactions in the payments and violation of bidding ordinances. They were not part of the motion for summary judgment. In recent years, the city has declared an emergency as a pretext for waiving competitive bidding on the payments.

City Attorney Tom Carpenter indicated at the hearing that the city would appeal the ruling, said Sam Ledbetter, one of the attorneys for plaintiff Jim Lynch, a retired UALR faculty member, former city employee and long-time political activist. The cities and their mayors were defendants.

The suit was supported by the Arkansas Public Law Center, a nonprofit group on whose board I sit. It was established to bring lawsuits in the public interest. The practice of sending taxpayer subsidies to private chambers of commerce is widespread in the state, so the final outcome of the case could have ramifications beyond Pulaski County.

The chamber resists freedom of information requests about its use of the money and the city has never provided a specific accounting beyond pro forma financial statements from the chamber. The chamber has conceded that the money goes to help pay for salaries of employees who have activities beyond industrial recruiting and include lobbying the state and national legislatures on issues important to the business community (but not necessarily working people). The suit also challenged the $100,000 paid to the Metropolitan Little Rock Alliance, also run by the Chamber of Commerce with money from various governments. It likewise gives no accounting and the money again goes to pay salaries of chamber employees.

North Little Rock paid $250,000 a year from 2009 to 2011 in support of the North Little Rock Economic Development Corporation as well as other payments to the North Little Rock chamber and the Metropolitan Alliance.  No specific purposes are given in agreements and there is no accounting of the spending.

The brief for summary judgment states the case in full.

Here's the city's response.

The city argues, among others, that at least since 2013 the city has entered "legitimate" sole source agreements with waived bidding and that it was too late to sue over payments in prior years because the contracts had been concluded. The city says the services are legitimate. Lynch argued that the chambers would be doing the same work with or without the city's money.



From the ArkTimes store

Favorite

Comments (15)

Showing 1-15 of 15

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-15 of 15

Add a comment

More by Max Brantley

Readers also liked…

  • Federal judge wants John Goodson to explain class action maneuvering

    A show-cause order filed Monday by federal Judge P.K. Holmes of Fort Smith indicates class action attorney John Goodson has some explaining to do about the move of a class action complaint against an insurance company from federal to state court with an instant pre-packaged settlement that has been criticized as a windfall for Goodson.
    • Dec 22, 2015
  • Women's March planned in Arkansas to mark Trump inauguration

    Speaking of Donald Trump and in answer to a reader's question: There will be a women's march in Arkansas on Jan. 21, the day after inauguration, as well as the national march planned in Washington.
    • Dec 30, 2016
  • Jason Rapert vs. Wikipedia

    Sen. Jason Rapert against the world: Wikipedia edition.
    • Jan 23, 2016

Most Shared

  • 'Cemetery angel' Ruth Coker Burks featured in new short film

    Ruth Coker Burks, the AIDS caregiver and activist memorably profiled by David Koon as the cemetery angel in Arkansas Times in 2015, is now the subject of a short film made by actress Rose McGowan.
  • Buyer remorse

    Out here in flyover country, you can't hardly go by the feed store without running into a reporter doing one of those Wisdom of the Heartland stories.
  • Not Whitewater

    Just think: If Democrats had turned out 78,000 more votes in three states in November, people could be reveling today in the prospect of impeaching and convicting President Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, as some Republican lawmakers had promised to try to do if she won.
  • Head-shaking

    Another edition of so-much-bad-news-so-little space.

Most Viewed

Most Recent Comments

Blogroll

 

© 2017 Arkansas Times | 201 East Markham, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72201
Powered by Foundation